Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Should we run the ball more this year?


  • Please log in to reply
72 replies to this topic

#31 jarhead

jarhead

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,622 posts
  • Locationnear Charlotte

Posted 19 August 2012 - 04:52 PM

To me it gives us a better chance to mask our defensive deficiencies if we can burn time off the clock running as much as the defense will allow

#32 DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 25,499 posts

Posted 19 August 2012 - 05:32 PM

To me it gives us a better chance to mask our defensive deficiencies if we can burn time off the clock running as much as the defense will allow

Meh. In this this league if you have a bad D....you need to score, score, and score some more.

#33 Baby Andy Reid

Baby Andy Reid

    finally someone fatter than Alice

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,656 posts

Posted 19 August 2012 - 05:42 PM

Done with the we have a bad d talk. We dont know yet. I think were lookin at 5 new staters from last year. Edwards, beason, kuechly, norman and tbd safety.

#34 KendrickPanther

KendrickPanther

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,460 posts

Posted 19 August 2012 - 05:48 PM

We can't run the ball much more....We were third in the league last season. The screen game is tricky business, a very effective tool but Cam struggles with the screen pass.

#35 bleys

bleys

    Simple and Plain

  • ALL-PRO
  • 15,512 posts

Posted 19 August 2012 - 06:06 PM

We can't run the ball much more....We were third in the league last season. The screen game is tricky business, a very effective tool but Cam struggles with the screen pass.


Deangelo didn't start off hot, Cam was throwing often early in the season, and a decent amount of Cam's rushing yards came from scrambles.. I think more ground and pound isn't out of the question, and at 5+ yards a carry, I'm not so sure we are sacrificing much..

#36 DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 25,499 posts

Posted 19 August 2012 - 06:28 PM

Deangelo didn't start off hot, Cam was throwing often early in the season, and a decent amount of Cam's rushing yards came from scrambles.. I think more ground and pound isn't out of the question, and at 5+ yards a carry, I'm not so sure we are sacrificing much..

If we switch to ground and pound....we won't be as efficient. We were a great rushing team in 2011. Not a ground and pound offense.

I still don't get why people want to fix what isn't broken. Cam will get better as well.


#37 CatMan72

CatMan72

    KEEP POUNDING

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,194 posts

Posted 19 August 2012 - 06:30 PM

Yup, we should focus on the run game to setup our play action passes and win TOP.

#38 bleys

bleys

    Simple and Plain

  • ALL-PRO
  • 15,512 posts

Posted 19 August 2012 - 06:38 PM

If we switch to ground and pound....we won't be as efficient. We were a great rushing team in 2011. Not a ground and pound offense.

I still don't get why people want to fix what isn't broken. Cam will get better as well.


perhaps ground and pound is too ancient of a term to use here... As Hurney said it sets the tone, you don't have to implement a traditional Power-O philosophy as much as if the D is putting 7 in the box I fully expect to see more running than passing in those situations..

Not because Cam can't throw, instead it wears down a defense which could have closed out a few games last year... By the 4th quarter we can lean on that running game and burn off the clock..

#39 broseidon

broseidon

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 285 posts
  • LocationYour daughters dorm room

Posted 19 August 2012 - 06:48 PM

Yes...

My reasoning behind this is all the money we are spending on running backs and fullbacks. A lot of $$ being thrown at them not to run the ball.

This will also open up the passing game the more successful we are running the ball

#40 DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 25,499 posts

Posted 19 August 2012 - 06:56 PM

perhaps ground and pound is too ancient of a term to use here... As Hurney said it sets the tone, you don't have to implement a traditional Power-O philosophy as much as if the D is putting 7 in the box, I fully expect to see more running than passing in those situations..

Not because Cam can't throw, but because it wears down a defense which could have closed out a few games last year... By the 4th quarter we can lean on that running game and burn off the clock..


I have no issue running and especially running from spread options looks....

Ground and pound implies traditional power run formations....and getting away from that + Cam gave us one of the best attacks we have seen in a single season. So yeah, that wording may make me think one thing and you be meaning another.


#41 Keep Pounding

Keep Pounding

    Smith & Wesson 460

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,786 posts
  • LocationIn your backyard!!!!

Posted 19 August 2012 - 06:59 PM

I think we will run the ball as long as we can get 1st downs and not have to play from behind a lot. If our DEF can hold the lead, and we control the clock, that is a recipe for success.

#42 bleys

bleys

    Simple and Plain

  • ALL-PRO
  • 15,512 posts

Posted 19 August 2012 - 07:55 PM

I have no issue running and especially running from spread options looks....

Ground and pound implies traditional power run formations....and getting away from that + Cam gave us one of the best attacks we have seen in a single season. So yeah, that wording may make me think one thing and you be meaning another.


if people catch me editing a lot, that's usually why.... ;)

#43 DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 25,499 posts

Posted 19 August 2012 - 08:12 PM

Yes...

My reasoning behind this is all the money we are spending on running backs and fullbacks. A lot of $$ being thrown at them not to run the ball.

This will also open up the passing game the more successful we are running the ball


Rookie Cam Newton broke Mannings record with no offseason.....yet we need to find a way to open up the passing game more?

We had Double Trouble last year....paychecks don't determine how you call games. Williams had more touches in 2007 as Fosters backup than in 2011... and 2011 was year one of his huge new deal.

I just don't see it. Nothing from year 1 of the Chud era seems to backup this rampant run more campaign.

Cam will be better...why take it out of his hands now when the coaches have voiced they wanted a heavy load on him early bc that was what the offense would require.

#44 iamhubby1

iamhubby1

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • ALL-PRO
  • 3,557 posts
  • LocationSpartanburg, SC

Posted 19 August 2012 - 08:14 PM

I think ground and pound is an archaic but realistic approach to our running game. If our Offense is as balanced as we believe it will, our running game will be even more effective. I can see our YPC as a team close to 6ypc.

So yes our ground game will pound you.

But our passing game will kill you if you fall asleep.

#45 iamhubby1

iamhubby1

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • ALL-PRO
  • 3,557 posts
  • LocationSpartanburg, SC

Posted 19 August 2012 - 08:23 PM

Rookie Cam Newton broke Mannings record with no offseason.....yet we need to find a way to open up the passing game more?

We had Double Trouble last year....paychecks don't determine how you call games. Williams had more touches in 2007 as Fosters backup than in 2011... and 2011 was year one of his huge new deal.

I just don't see it. Nothing from year 1 of the Chud era seems to backup this rampant run more campaign.

Cam will be better...why take it out of his hands now when the coaches have voiced they wanted a heavy load on him early bc that was what the offense would require.


Look at it this way. Other teams have their RB that can do RB things. Our RB are weapons. Surround Cam with as many weapons as possible. Cam has a dozen or more years left. Double Trouble does not. Maybe in a coulple of years Cam won't need DT. But why do we have to find out now?

By the time Cam needs to be taken care of, both DWill and Stew will be off the books.

Also. As happy as I am that Cam did not run the other night. I know that is not going to be the trend. His running is a weapon that needs to be used. But it was nice, and it put teams on notice, that we could score without Cam running.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com