Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

A. Smith As ST Returner?

Armand Smith Special Teams

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
14 replies to this topic

#1 Cape Fear Cat

Cape Fear Cat

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 831
  • Reputation: 284
HUDDLER

Posted 31 August 2012 - 07:00 AM

Did anyone else find themselves watching Armand Smith run the ball last night and thinking that maybe he might be a good option as a return man? The way he seemed able to find seams in the defense and quick-cut through them for more yards than he should've been able to get was pretty impressive to me. I laos liked how he batted away the hands of the Steelers trying to grab him as he sprinted past. Seems to have a lot of fight in him. I'd hate to be the guy who has to decide who gets the pink slip among our RBs.

#2 bauss

bauss

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 14-September 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 809
  • Reputation: 13
HUDDLER

Posted 31 August 2012 - 07:02 AM

cut dwill. Plenty of room for A. Smith.

#3 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 20,111
  • Reputation: 5,625
HUDDLER

Posted 31 August 2012 - 07:10 AM

Being a good return man is WAY more than being able to run with the ball....that is the easy part. Fielding punts in traffic is something that is awful hard to teach at this level.

#4 Herbert The Love Bug

Herbert The Love Bug

    Stripper Name: Bo Dangles

  • Joined: 04-August 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,567
  • Reputation: 2,313
HUDDLER

Posted 31 August 2012 - 07:15 AM

They used him quite a bit as a return man in the preseason...

#5 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,261
  • Reputation: 5,361
Moderators

Posted 31 August 2012 - 07:28 AM

Being a good return man is WAY more than being able to run with the ball....that is the easy part. Fielding punts in traffic is something that is awful hard to teach at this level.


He could do kickoffs.

#6 jarhead

jarhead

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,647
  • Reputation: 999
HUDDLER

Posted 31 August 2012 - 08:02 AM

I like this guy. He adds a bit more of that quick scat back attributes. For him to make the 53 he will have to show ST value.I like him over Poole for those reasons

#7 GotSwag?

GotSwag?

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 15-December 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 809
  • Reputation: 85
HUDDLER

Posted 31 August 2012 - 08:11 AM

Good idea...if we didnt have Pilares and Adams already.

#8 redbuddha

redbuddha

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 19-September 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,007
  • Reputation: 206
HUDDLER

Posted 31 August 2012 - 08:19 AM

I would be tempted to put Armond on kickoffs over Pilares. Or at least every once in awhile as a change up.

#9 Cape Fear Cat

Cape Fear Cat

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 831
  • Reputation: 284
HUDDLER

Posted 31 August 2012 - 08:20 AM

I guess I just hate the thought of losing a guy who has obvious talent like Smith does. It seems we have an embarrassment of riches when it comes to our RBs this year.

#10 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,261
  • Reputation: 5,361
Moderators

Posted 31 August 2012 - 08:21 AM

Despite his TD return last year, I am not against being open to a new KO returner.

#11 PantherPhann89

PantherPhann89

    CPP "Carolina Panther Phann"

  • Joined: 25-June 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,535
  • Reputation: 424
HUDDLER

Posted 31 August 2012 - 08:25 AM

Armond Smith did himself a great service by his play against the Steelers, interesting.

#12 Captain Morgan

Captain Morgan

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 09-January 12
  • posts: 2,756
  • Reputation: 1,501
SUPPORTER

Posted 31 August 2012 - 08:30 AM

hate to cut the guy...he played well against the fins too

#13 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
HUDDLER

Posted 31 August 2012 - 08:48 AM

H3ll fuggn yes!!!!
Dude is better than Pilares.

I need a coach who will let better players play instead of playing someone who's clearly not as good but just bc they wasted a freaking damn draft pick on them.

#14 JawnyBlaze

JawnyBlaze

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • posts: 7,475
  • Reputation: 1,926
SUPPORTER

Posted 31 August 2012 - 09:03 AM

I agree. Pilares did decently as a KR last year, but his returns so far this preseason have been less than impressive. I think he's shown enough as a WR to keep a spot just for that, and Smith might make it as the RB3/KR. I'd hate to see Poole go, would be great to keep him as the RB3, I've liked him as a RB just a little more than Smith, but they've both been super impressive and if Smith can win the KR job that'd probably give him the edge over Poole.

#15 TANTRIC-NINJA

TANTRIC-NINJA

    Dey Hate Us Because They Aint Us!

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,794
  • Reputation: 2,229
HUDDLER

Posted 31 August 2012 - 12:07 PM

Poole and smith have been promising.. I would be suprised if either made our taxi squad with a few teams in desperate for running backs.