Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Kuechly

234 posts in this topic

Posted

I don't think you know what you're talking about.

We had the 9th pick. Not number 8. And at that spot Kuechly was the best defensive player on the board and we had two LBs coming off terrible injuries. Slowest learner? First of all Joe Adams hasn't sniffed the offense because he doesn't know the play book. (several preseason plays he didn't know where to line up and had to be directed by someone). Kuechly was making tons of tackles when he played every snap during preseason because he was apart of the game...now with the Davis being a factor Kuechly has had limited snaps and is asked to take on FBs....

He's a stud. Don't worry about him.

What does this have to do with Adams and Cox was the best player on the board not kuechly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Davis is a seasoned player who's seen it all.

Kuechly has played 2 games haha

Apples are red and sometimes not red at all.

See I can point out stuff that has nothing to do with the conversation too!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

What does this have to do with Adams and Cox was the best player on the board not kuechly.

You said Kuechly was the slowest learner out of our rookies....clearly he is far from it

And Cox rotates on Philly's line....so basically they are in same position.

Kuechly set records in college. Won every defensive award basically...he was BPA at number 9 and we were going defense

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Apples are red and sometimes not red at all.

See I can point out stuff that has nothing to do with the conversation too!

I'm commenting on what you said and showing how ridiculous you are being

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

And you avoided half of what I said because you know it's true

We good though

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I would hate to be a consistently negative about my favorite teams as some of y'all. I'm not saying anybody should be a blind homer, I just don't understand how some people look to find the negative and bitch about everything. If you spend more time being negative about your team than positive, why bother? Sports is reducing the total amount of happiness in your life.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I would hate to be a consistently negative about my favorite teams as some of y'all. I'm not saying anybody should be a blind homer, I just don't understand how some people look to find the negative and bitch about everything. If you spend more time being negative about your team than positive, why bother? Sports is reducing the total amount of happiness in your life.

Who's being negative? Some people are pointing out the truth compared to the hypocrisy . No one has said the kid was going to be bad either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I think Luke will get better as the season rolls on.He has been moved around allot with Beason and TD healthy,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Okay, call it an issue, not a question. You obviously were not supportive of the Kuechly pick and questioned Hurney's strategy. I used Fletcher Cox as an example of someone many wanted pre-draft, including me.

But yes, I do have a question. Who would you have picked, and how would you have addressed the weakside linebacker position?

Cox hasn't made a huge impact yet, and neither has Coples.

I guess lot of folks think that we would be headed straight to the Superbowl if we had gone with Fairley in the first last year and Cox in the first this year.

Yeah..2 first round DTs is all that Jimmy needed to guarantee success.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I don't think you know what you're talking about.

We had the 9th pick. Not number 8. And at that spot Kuechly was the best defensive player on the board and we had two LBs coming off terrible injuries. Slowest learner? First of all Joe Adams hasn't sniffed the offense because he doesn't know the play book. (several preseason plays he didn't know where to line up and had to be directed by someone). Kuechly was making tons of tackles when he played every snap during preseason because he was apart of the game...now with the Davis being a factor Kuechly has had limited snaps and is asked to take on FBs....

He's a stud. Don't worry about him.

the dude is trolling, whether he knows it or not

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

the dude is trolling, whether he knows it or not

Or someone farted on his pillow last night and he's irritated

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Okay, call it an issue, not a question. You obviously were not supportive of the Kuechly pick and questioned Hurney's strategy. I used Fletcher Cox as an example of someone many wanted pre-draft, including me.

But yes, I do have a question. Who would you have picked, and how would you have addressed the weakside linebacker position?

Pretty easy to know criticize my picks but whatever. Clabourne, Cox, Brockers, Coples, Jones, and maybe Blackman depending on any inside info I would have on Gettis, are people I would have targeted at that spot. So based on how it went down, I would have picked Cox or traded down. McClain was slated to start, and everyone was saying McFua was fine. DT was a weakness, but we have a short term fix for now.

LBer pretty much addressed itself Beason, Anderson, Davis who we have invested in is who I would relied on at the LBer spot if I was stuck in that position. If one of them went down, I would have no problem with Phillips or Senn starting a season, if another one went down, Hurney would have me beat me, but that goes back to the argument of how much do you really want to invest in a postion like LBer, and how smart it is to do so. Only two of them are going to be on the field half the time anyway.

I really hope noone uses a LB injury argument because common sense will tell you that applies for DT's too. Just like we didn't know how Davis, and Beason would respond, we had no idea how an old DT who never played in our system would respond either. And we are in bad shape if one of the Edwards go down in a more essential position too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites