Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Shockey toughness?

16 posts in this topic

Posted

I can tell you this that if Tolbert is suppose to be Shockey's replacement, Id rather have Shockey based on how we utilize Tolbert.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I can tell you this that if Tolbert is suppose to be Shockey's replacement, Id rather have Shockey based on how we utilize Tolbert.

Well, I'd rather not have a lot of players based on what Chud does...

Would rather have defensive players

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Shockey would have been barking out there for sure, but would he have given Cam more time in the pocket, or opened up any running lanes? If anyone can do that, please stand up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Well, I'd rather not have a lot of players based on what Chud does...

Would rather have defensive players

What's the point of having a lot of defensive players when we're going to play soft D. Why not play Gamble like how he's being paid. Why have your rookie cb on the opponent's best WR?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites