Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Rapist Demands Visitation Rights to the Child He Fathered


  • Please log in to reply
33 replies to this topic

#1 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • Joined: 10-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,896
  • Reputation: 3,406
  • LocationShallotte, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 29 September 2012 - 07:50 PM

An unidentified man, who plead guilty to statutory rape of a 14-year-old girl in 2009 and got her pregnant, is now filing for visitation rights to see the toddler produced by the rape.
The man was sentenced to 16 years probation in 2011, reports the Daily Mail. Part of the probation required that he pay child support, however, that also entitles him to seek visitation rights.
The man met the 14-year-old girl at church and, later, had sex with her and got the teen pregnant. However, she was too young to legally consent to sex, reports Fox 25.
The victim’s mom told Fox 25: "She decided to keep her baby. And now she has to hand her baby over for a visit with her rapist?"
The teen's attorney Wendy Murphy told the NY Daily News that she asked the court to require the rapist pay restitution instead of child support, which would deny him access to the toddler.



http://www.opposingv...ild-he-fathered

So it was statutory rape, which implies consent despite the legal definition of "being able to consent". Unfortunately we do not know if this is a case of 18 has sex with 14yr old as the age of the offender isn't listed.

Anyhow, what say you Tinderbox compatriots - Should he be allowed to see his child?

#2 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 16,822
  • Reputation: 4,808
HUDDLER

Posted 29 September 2012 - 08:00 PM

It's idiotic that he's paying child support; in my view that lends legitimacy to it being "his child." He should be in prison, and the state should offer the support she needs.

Visitation rights shouldn't even be in the picture, cyproterone acetate should.

#3 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • Joined: 10-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,896
  • Reputation: 3,406
  • LocationShallotte, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 29 September 2012 - 08:03 PM

It's idiotic that he's paying child support; in my view that lends legitimacy to it being "his child." He should be in prison, and the state should offer the support she needs.

Visitation rights shouldn't even be in the picture, cyproterone acetate should.


So supposing this was the case of two teenagers having "consensual" sex you would be pro sterilization?

#4 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 16,822
  • Reputation: 4,808
HUDDLER

Posted 29 September 2012 - 08:17 PM

So supposing this was the case of two teenagers having "consensual" sex you would be pro sterilization?

It's not, other articles have more comments from the girl where she talks about how he forced her into it. Would she be fighting so hard against this if it were consensual?

And cyproterone acetate isn't sterilization, it simply kills sexual urges and is reversable.

#5 PhillyB

PhillyB

    sườn núi phía đông thứ ba của mặt trời

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 22,951
  • Reputation: 18,391
  • Locationthird spur east of the sun
HUDDLER

Posted 29 September 2012 - 08:19 PM

met at church lol

#6 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • Joined: 10-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,896
  • Reputation: 3,406
  • LocationShallotte, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 29 September 2012 - 08:22 PM

It's not, other articles have more comments from the girl where she talks about how he forced her into it. Would she be fighting so hard against this if it were consensual?

And cyproterone acetate isn't sterilization, it simply kills sexual urges and is reversable.


He was sentenced to statutory rape, if it was non consensual and/or forced rape, it would have just been a rape charge and he would have been in prison. The statutory rape charge implies consent.

#7 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • Joined: 10-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,896
  • Reputation: 3,406
  • LocationShallotte, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 29 September 2012 - 08:24 PM

I suppose that could have just been part of a plea arrangement, but assuming that you were actually raped and pregnant from said rape, would you agree to offer a plea of statutory rape....it seems unlikely.

I think the girls comments are more a symptom of not wanting to give visitation rights (which very well could be parentally motivated), more so than indictments of the rape action.

#8 Panthers128

Panthers128

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 04-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,283
  • Reputation: 104
HUDDLER

Posted 29 September 2012 - 10:58 PM

I've seen some hot 14-year-olds. I grow tired of these parents and community members whining about men taking advantage of their daughters. Ultimately the parents didn't raise their daughter and the 'rapists' merely took what was available to him.

The guy should've used a rubber, though. It would've still felt good and he wouldn't have wasted 16 years in prison nor would he be paying child support. He also wouldn't have been raped by Jerome or Jermaine.

He shouldn't be allowed to see the child because he showed a severe lack of judgement by not wearing a rubber. That, in my opinion, is more damaging than his having had consensual sex with a 14-year-old.

#9 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 16,822
  • Reputation: 4,808
HUDDLER

Posted 29 September 2012 - 11:54 PM

I've seen some hot 14-year-olds. I grow tired of these parents and community members whining about men taking advantage of their daughters. Ultimately the parents didn't raise their daughter and the 'rapists' merely took what was available to him.

The guy should've used a rubber, though. It would've still felt good and he wouldn't have wasted 16 years in prison nor would he be paying child support. He also wouldn't have been raped by Jerome or Jermaine.

He shouldn't be allowed to see the child because he showed a severe lack of judgement by not wearing a rubber. That, in my opinion, is more damaging than his having had consensual sex with a 14-year-old.

Ron Paul revolution!

#10 Porn Shop Clerk

Porn Shop Clerk

    Honky

  • Joined: 22-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,247
  • Reputation: 4,031
HUDDLER

Posted 30 September 2012 - 12:16 AM

I've seen some hot 14-year-olds. I grow tired of these parents and community members whining about men taking advantage of their daughters. Ultimately the parents didn't raise their daughter and the 'rapists' merely took what was available to him.

The guy should've used a rubber, though. It would've still felt good and he wouldn't have wasted 16 years in prison nor would he be paying child support. He also wouldn't have been raped by Jerome or Jermaine.

He shouldn't be allowed to see the child because he showed a severe lack of judgement by not wearing a rubber. That, in my opinion, is more damaging than his having had consensual sex with a 14-year-old.


its times like these when i really do hope there is a hell

and i hope somewhere in that hell is a special place for sick fugs like you


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users