Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Judge Upholds Contraception Mandate


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 NanuqoftheNorth

NanuqoftheNorth

    Frosty Alaskan Amber

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,641 posts
  • LocationAlaska

Posted 05 October 2012 - 03:29 AM

On Friday, a Bush-appointed federal judge (the first Bush, not the second) ruled in favor of the HHS in a lawsuit over the contraception mandate. This isn’t too surprising; the challenges to the mandate are on really shaky grounds. But I was particularly tickled, because the judge defended the mandate on two arguments that I have been using repeatedly, especially at RH Reality Check and Double X: Withholding the benefit is a violation of the employee’s religious liberty and since the benefit is part of a compensation package, trying to control how the employee spends it on religious grounds is really no different than telling the employee she can’t spend her money on birth control because you sign her paychecks.

Because this is about female sexuality and there’s all these sex-phobic and misogynist arguments being thrown around, the basic issue has gotten somewhat obscured, which is that your boss is not actually your master. Also, your compensation is not your allowance, and they don’t get to dock your pay because they think you’re being naughty on your own time. Conservatives would generally like to give employers more control over their employees, so anyone who supports the plantiffs in these lawsuits because they’re pissed that women are having sex without including them is being an utter fool, as well as an asshole. If the door is opened to allowing employers to control how you use your compensation after you’ve earned it, god only knows what other kinds of restrictions on how you spend your money they’re going to start angling for.


http://www.rawstory....eption-mandate/

#2 carpantherfan84

carpantherfan84

    Abductive Reasoner

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,497 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 08:39 AM

wow, seriously wow

#3 gospodin shuttlesworth

gospodin shuttlesworth

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,607 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 03:42 PM

Conservatives would generally like to give employers more control over their employees, so anyone who supports the plantiffs in these lawsuits because they’re pissed that women are having sex without including them is being an utter fool, as well as an asshole.


yeah but if we stopped being foolish assholes then what would become of the republican party?

#4 twylyght

twylyght

    The picture of how I care

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,327 posts

Posted 06 October 2012 - 11:18 AM

why exactly is this any business of the government? just as one should not be able to restrict anyone from doing as they wish so long as they do not infringe upon the rights of others, conversely no one should be compelled to support anyone else's behavior against their will.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.