Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Should the team consider trading beason


  • Please log in to reply
54 replies to this topic

#16 R0CKnR0LLA

R0CKnR0LLA

    Drunk Posting

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,726 posts
  • LocationLas Vegas, NV

Posted 10 October 2012 - 04:38 PM

It's weird that we have probably our two most talented defenders at the same position with no real optimal solution.


And by weird I mean just terrible foresight by management.

#17 jtnc

jtnc

    Resident Asshole

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,082 posts
  • LocationNorth Carolina

Posted 10 October 2012 - 04:38 PM

Come on now, Texans only got a 4th rounder for Demeco Ryans after his achilles injury.

#18 Tarheels23

Tarheels23

    Keep Pounding

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,664 posts

Posted 10 October 2012 - 04:43 PM

With Cushings going down, trading Demeco Ryans to the Eagles is no longer a good example for why we should trade Beason.

#19 pilot2011

pilot2011

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 280 posts

Posted 10 October 2012 - 04:49 PM

trade Beason and a 3rd for Ngata.

...or just keep him and have 4 really good linebackers.

#20 nobody

nobody

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 365 posts

Posted 10 October 2012 - 04:57 PM

-anybody know how long he has on his contract?

#21 jtnc

jtnc

    Resident Asshole

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,082 posts
  • LocationNorth Carolina

Posted 10 October 2012 - 04:59 PM

-anybody know how long he has on his contract?


Four.

#22 Marguide

Marguide

    South of the Border

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,345 posts

Posted 10 October 2012 - 05:00 PM

-anybody know how long he has on his contract?


He just got extended last year. Those saying we should trade him apparently haven't seen his contract. No team is going to touch that. No how, no way.

#23 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 34,632 posts
  • LocationSC

Posted 10 October 2012 - 05:00 PM

Anybody is tradable given the right offer.

What you have to do is...

A ) Define "the right offer" and...

B ) Ask whether anyone would realistically make that offer

So yes, I'd do it, but at this point, I doubt the value is out there to make it worthwhile.

#24 Brooklyn Bully

Brooklyn Bully

    #1

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,793 posts

Posted 10 October 2012 - 05:02 PM

At this point in time, Luke is better. If we can get two other LBs as good as what Beason gives us now, and we can get something good for him, why not. But is there is 1% chance he'll heal up, we keep him.

#25 nobody

nobody

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 365 posts

Posted 10 October 2012 - 05:02 PM

four and a big injury risk?...... not worth it - let him get well and lets see

#26 SOJA

SOJA

    King McNutt 2016

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,803 posts

Posted 10 October 2012 - 05:09 PM

injured with a big contact, worth more to us here

#27 Marguide

Marguide

    South of the Border

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,345 posts

Posted 10 October 2012 - 05:09 PM

Anybody is tradable given the right offer.

What you have to do is...

A) Define"the right offer" and...

B) Ask whether anyone would realistically make that offer

So yes, I'd do it, but I doubt the value is out there to make it worthwhile.


Not really true. If we traded him now, we would have to eat $12 million dollars in bonus that has not yet hit the cap. Even if a team knocked us out with an offer, there is no way Marty can take that kind of hit right now.

When Marty does these contracts, he is doing them in a way that players can be cut or re-structured in year 3 of the deal, but the hit from trading them, when you have to absorb all the bonus allocation at once rather than over two years, makes it nearly impossible to move them until the last year of their deal.

Edit: Correction. Under the current CBA, we could trade a player after June 1st and spread the hit over two years. Or, we can designate up to 2 players to do it after the start of the league year but before June 1st, and spread it over 2 years. In either case, we could not afford to trade Beason (or DWill) before the start of the next league year. The cap hit would be more than we could bear.

#28 Argus Plexus

Argus Plexus

    Super Kami Guru

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,501 posts
  • LocationCape Fear Area

Posted 10 October 2012 - 05:10 PM

Trade talks already? Wow Huddle.

#29 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,716 posts

Posted 10 October 2012 - 05:50 PM

Right now...cheer for Indy. With no clear starting RB (Donald Brown hurt) and if they think they have a chance to make a run, they might spend a little for a RB. In fact, with so many teams losing RBs to IR/or for weeks it would seem to be a good time to shop DWill.

#30 Jackofalltrades

Jackofalltrades

    OWN the Line of Scrimmage

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,811 posts
  • LocationNC

Posted 10 October 2012 - 06:01 PM

I'd rather seem him play a rotational role until he's up to par, then let he and Keek compete to play the Mike.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.