Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

I am right, most of YOU are wrong...and the zone read is STILL a Red Herring


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#1 TonyN

TonyN

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 26-October 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 700
  • Reputation: 204
HUDDLER

Posted 04 November 2012 - 01:38 AM

Thanx to nonesuchapanther for posting a link to the Charlotte Observer. This is a copy and paste from an articlle discussing the Panthers' rushing woes...


• Of planned running plays, the zone-read has been used most often, on 80 of the 148 rushing attempts (54 percent). The zone-read involves Newton sticking the ball in the running back’s stomach and either giving it to him or taking it back. When he takes the ball back, he can either run himself or pitching it, based on his read of the defense.
• The zone-read has also been the team’s most effective rushing play, accounting for 407 of the team’s 682 rushing yards (59.7 percent).
• Of those zone-read yards, 319 have come from runs by Newton or the running back in the zone-read action. The other 88 came on six option pitches, when Newton pulls the ball from the running back’s grasp and pulls left or right, then pitches the ball.
• Who is the most effective on zone-read plays? Newton, who averages 5.8 yards per zone-read carry, DeAngelo Williams averages 5.0 yards on those plays, and Jonathan Stewart gains 4.0 yards.


I hate to inform you people of this, but even with the relatively poor execution of the zone read by the Panthers, they are averaging 5 yards a carry running out of it.

Guess what...5 yards a carry in the NFL is really good...

I bequeathe this information to the unenlightend out of compassion...

I am a voice crying out in the wilderness...

And most of you are boneheads...

http://www.charlotte...##storylink=cpy







Read more here: http://www.charlotte...y#storylink=cpy



#2 Herbert The Love Bug

Herbert The Love Bug

    Stripper Name: Bo Dangles

  • Joined: 04-August 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,567
  • Reputation: 2,312
  • Locationtied to your basement wall
HUDDLER

Posted 04 November 2012 - 01:45 AM

what u mean "you people" dont u be offendicising me like tomy

#3 Ivan The Awesome

Ivan The Awesome

    Keep Pounding...all the way to...the draft! :D

  • Joined: 11-May 11
  • posts: 10,049
  • Reputation: 2,743
  • LocationNC
SUPPORTER

Posted 04 November 2012 - 02:15 AM

It's averaging 1 win this season. /thread.

#4 Urrymonster

Urrymonster

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,264
  • Reputation: 39
HUDDLER

Posted 04 November 2012 - 02:48 AM

Despite the gifs this is an interesting post. I wonder if we can get hold of our passing performance out of it, as that would tell the whole picture.

I would guess the results are fairly boom or bust out of this however it does contrast to most people's impressions of it - hence the reaction. If the info about cams success in play action based passing relates to the read option as I suspect it does, then it is actually - by far - our most successful formation.

Bizarre really.

To jt, just because you don't like Tony, doesn't mean this information is any less worthwhile. It is quite eye opening to be honest...

#5 Zod

Zod

    YOUR RULER

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 20,088
  • Reputation: 14,958
MFCEO

Posted 04 November 2012 - 04:28 AM

jtgreensboro gets a vacation for unapproved gif bombing

#6 Navy_football

Navy_football

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 19-April 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 909
  • Reputation: 364
  • LocationArlington, VA
HUDDLER

Posted 04 November 2012 - 05:53 AM

Yes but the average is distorted because yardage comes in spurts and big plays. It's not an effective play when we need 2-3 tough yards. Say Cam has 10 rushes for 58 yards. One of those runs is 40, but the other 9 rushes are for 18 yards. Need more consistent gains.

#7 Rubi

Rubi

    Squid Smasher

  • Joined: 28-October 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,376
  • Reputation: 751
  • LocationCharlotte
HUDDLER

Posted 04 November 2012 - 06:43 AM

The zone read option is a crap NFL offense.

Watch the games and you'll see why

#8 Navy_football

Navy_football

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 19-April 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 909
  • Reputation: 364
  • LocationArlington, VA
HUDDLER

Posted 04 November 2012 - 06:55 AM

The zone read option is a crap NFL offense.

Watch the games and you'll see why


And I would never run any type of option play in the red zone in the NFL. To me, that's flirting with disaster. It's a great change of pace play if you have an athletic QB, but if you run it enough that an NFL team prepares for it, you're doing something wrong.

#9 CarolinaFTW

CarolinaFTW

    Member

  • Joined: 15-January 10
  • posts: 71
  • Reputation: 4
ROOKIE

Posted 04 November 2012 - 06:58 AM

Yes but the average is distorted because yardage comes in spurts and big plays. It's not an effective play when we need 2-3 tough yards. Say Cam has 10 rushes for 58 yards. One of those runs is 40, but the other 9 rushes are for 18 yards. Need more consistent gains.


This pretty much sums it up. Only seen JStew hit a big run once during this play. DeAngelo? don't even know. Maybe against that putrid Saints defense. Line up and run it down their throats. How many Ls does it take before you realize you need to switch it up?

#10 chknwing

chknwing

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 04-May 09
  • posts: 8,185
  • Reputation: 6,118
SUPPORTER

Posted 04 November 2012 - 07:06 AM

the zone read doesnt work because, A) Chud built this team as a pass first team. The offensive line cant create any holes for the rb nor cam. C) It forces Cam to carry too much of the work load D)Ruuning the read option too much takes the wr's out of the game. E) Unless you are playing against carolina, running the same play over and over does not work in the NFL. :)


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users