Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

4th Quarter FG Attempt?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
28 replies to this topic

#25 Jackofalltrades

Jackofalltrades

    OWN the Line of Scrimmage

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • posts: 18,829
  • Reputation: 6,830
SUPPORTER

Posted 04 November 2012 - 05:08 PM

I don't have a problem with it.

Actually have a bigger problem with the long pass we threw before the fg attempt. A run or a nice short pass that would have made it a easier fg attempt, and kept the clock moving would have been better imo.


I loved that aggressive throw, was glad to see it and Cam placed it well so there was little chance of an int.

#26 osd22

osd22

    Weltmeister

  • Joined: 14-October 10
  • posts: 885
  • Reputation: 434
SUPPORTER

Posted 04 November 2012 - 05:13 PM

Enjoy the win...but I am concerned with the two Shanks Nortman was responsible for.


I am as well but I assume these are simply rookie mistakes. Most of his punts are good or great. He´ll be fine.

#27 Proudiddy

Proudiddy

    The Thread Killer (Since 2004)

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 17,684
  • Reputation: 5,613
Moderators

Posted 04 November 2012 - 05:17 PM

Enjoy the win...but I am concerned with the two Shanks Nortman was responsible for.

As someone pointed out in the game chat, I think it's because they're asking him to directional kick it, or rugby punt it...

On the replay at the end of the game where he got ran into, you can clearly see him dropping the nose of the ball down when making contact... So, I think it's because he's not comfortable with that style of punting.

#28 HeatCheck

HeatCheck

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 09-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,774
  • Reputation: 81
HUDDLER

Posted 04 November 2012 - 05:17 PM

Yeah I felt like I was the only one in the chat wanting to punt, or maybe even go for it. With the long missed FG attempt, they got the ball on the hold, not the line of scrimmage. At least if we went for it and missed, the Skins would lose the extra 7 (or more) yards they'd get from the missed FG. There wasn't a lot to gain other than 3 possession game.

With a punt, you put them inside their own 20 and they have to drive the length of the field. They hadn't scored a TD on us up to this point. Yes, a FG would have made it a 3 possession game but being backed up inside the 20 down 2 possession with just over 2 mins is a difficult task. Clearly, much more difficult than what they were dealt.

Luckily, it didn't hurt us. And really, I still felt semi-confident we'd win given the missed FG but the punt would have been a better situation.

#29 Davidson Deac II

Davidson Deac II

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 18,133
  • Reputation: 1,529
HUDDLER

Posted 04 November 2012 - 05:18 PM

I loved that aggressive throw, was glad to see it and Cam placed it well so there was little chance of an int.


Didn't care about an interception. In truth, an interception wouldn't have hurt us any more than the incomplete pass did.

Stopping the clock bothered me. With 9 minutes left, thats a good play. With 5 minutes and a 15 point lead though, we needed run time off the clock.

Fortunately, the Skins are pretty bad so it didn't matter. They took forever to score their only td, had to use a timeout, so our failure to run more time off the clock didn't matter.