Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

DeAngelo has got to go

76 posts in this topic

Posted

eventually he'll break off a long run and jack up his ypc and everyone will forget about the 50 sucktastic carries he had before it.

Just like how everyone forgets how great he's been for us?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

He sucks bc the system sucks for him.

Hes a straight runner off an Iformation.

Gruden even said it earlier that hes not a lateral side to side runner.

The man ran for 18tds a one time. This offense just suck for him. and even for Stewart.

Even AP wouldnt be able to run in this pathetic offense.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

i-approve-baby-with-pipe-meme.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Ughhh this stings...

Thank you for the info

Yep it blows, but these are the tough decisions our GM is going to have to make. Beason's is even worse ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

To be fair, he actually looked decent when we lined up in the I tonight. That's scheme not fitting the players... screw this option crap for the good of all of our players.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

He sucks bc the system sucks for him.

Hes a straight runner off an Iformation.

Gruden even said it earlier that hes not a lateral side to side runner.

The man ran for 18tds a one time. This offense just suck for him. and even for Stewart.

Even AP wouldnt be able to run in this pathetic offense.

That was 2008.....4 yrs is a long time ago in the NFL. He isn't the same RB. Yes, he isn't ideal for our system.....but his age is showing. Does with most RBs as they near 30.

AP would be fine in this offense.....he doesn't go down and he can make his own play.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Yep it blows, but these are the tough decisions our GM is going to have to make. Beason's is even worse ...

Only chance is if they agree to restructure..

Haaaaaaa....haaa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Only chance is if they agree to restructure..

Haaaaaaa....haaa

Signing bonus is still there if you restructure. Hurney and JR fuged us with these deals....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Stewart was 8 carries for 27 yards. That's fuging dreadful.

if William's 11 yard run doesn't get called back, he had a better game than Stewart.

Both of our backs are good. Scheme and blocking are not.

This. Can't believe what I'm reading in this thread. The problem isn't Williams.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Signing bonus is still there if you restructure. Hurney and JR fuged us with these deals....

All we can hope for is a new staff with a scheme that utilizes what we have on the roster. Instead of asking guys to play away from their strengths.

This team would have a chance if we did that from the beginning

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

This. Can't believe what I'm reading in this thread. The problem isn't Williams.

Sure it is. In this offense. Williams is bad. YPC is comparable to Stewart....only difference is Stewart consistantly grinds out small yards. Williams does nothing over and over hurting drives then has 1 run to give him a YPC near Stewart.

OL wasn't an issue last year. Didn't fit then either. Each passing year he gets worse thanks to Father Time as well

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

All we can hope for is a new staff with a scheme that utilizes what we have on the roster. Instead of asking guys to play away from their strengths.

This team would have a chance if we did that from the beginning

Heck no.....last thing we need to do is hire another coach and ask him to win with a majority Hurney/Fox roster. THAT is a big reason we suck. Don't want to go back to Fox ball.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites