Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

broseidon

Bob Costas is a Troll

185 posts in this topic

"I don't like your graphs so they are Fluff, here are more of my graphs that I like because they say what I want" Panthro on Gun Control

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess Bob Costas would prefer it if she were pushed out a window? Or maybe since libs feel they have the gop on the ropes for every other issue they used to principle themselves by, that this is a good time to push them into changing thier opinions on gunlaws too. Remember, never let a good crisis go to waste

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the dailymail is like if tmz and foxnews had a british baby

If you say so. I was looking for the statistics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking for more recent infos.

It's not as clear cut as BOTH sides want to make it.

Should I be able to buy a rocket launcher ? No

Should I be able to buy most Semi-Auto firearms. Yep.

Should things be put in place to keep crazies/felons from having fire arms? Yes

Should that infringe on my right to have firearms ? Nope

A right to bear arms means a right to weapons. Why is it not my right to own a rocket launcher but it is my right to own a pistol or a sword? The whole point was to form a militia don't you think a militia in this day and age would at least have rocket launchers and maybe a few grenades?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A right to bear arms means a right to weapons. Why is it not my right to own a rocket launcher but it is my right to own a pistol or a sword? The whole point was to form a militia don't you think a militia in this day and age would at least have rocket launchers and maybe a few grenades?

Because we live in a world where things that are dumb are acknowledged as such.

Come on Cat, you can troll me better than that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because we live in a world where things that are dumb are acknowledged as such.

Come on Cat, you can troll me better than that.

So because you think its dumb it should be illegal. Well if that is the logic we are using then I guess I can simply say I think guns are dumb so they should be illegal.

I'm pushing you to form a good argument about something you are clearly passionate about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It takes a lot less conviction to pull a trigger and shoot someone in the head than taking a bat or a knife and getting dirty.

I feel like this comment is underappreciated

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I find most interesting is the media's refusal to condemn Jovan. Someone should stand up and say he's a worthless murderer and praise him for killing himself and saving our tax dollars from being wasted on another trial.

But this is the logic of certain groups in the USA. They don't blame individuals for anything and do not believe in personal responsibility. Everything is the product of the system and if the system is tuned appropriately, everyone will be a loving angel like Jesus. Jovan was in the NFL, a successful human being, so these people can't rant about there not being enough welfare this time so now they'll rant about how guns are the problem.

Jovan was just a thug who lacked self control, but again, he shot himself, so I will offer him some praise. If you're man enough to kill someone, be man enough to end your own life as well and not waste everyone's tax dollars for your trial and free housing, food, gym, and healthcare for life.

yeah, but by bobs logic we should still hold a trial and try to convict the gun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"I don't like your graphs so they are Fluff, here are more of my graphs that I like because they say what I want" Panthro on Gun Control

1dycj.jpg

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you say so. I was looking for the statistics.

lolz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Of course, he's so massive he has his own gravitational pull. 
    • You miss the point. Taylor was here before. We picked him because of what he could do for our wide receivers not because he had some great knowledge no other person had on the staff. Shula and Rivera and Gettleman studied multiple college systems for months before signing Taylor or drafting McCaffrey or Curtis and would have drafted the same whether Taylor was here or not. They liked the way Taylor developed McCaffrey which showed his talent but Stanford's offense wasn't Taylors idea or unique to him. Shula has a connection to Taylor as early as when Shula was at Alabama.  The debate was whether Taylor was chosen to replace Shula because Shula didn't know what to do to run a college offense and if he screwed up Taylor would replace him. And that Taylor was the reason and most influential in getting McCaffrey. I said it wasn't even close to the truth and this plan predated Taylor and was more thorough and we'll thought out. Everything since then just confirms I was right once again like usual.  
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      18,243
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    GSO Goat
    Joined