Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Delhommey

Icelandic Recovery

42 posts in this topic

556704_3425935506976_1288654966_n.jpg

Iceland fell hard in 2008. Its engorged banking system sunk and unemployment soared. The government was jeered out of office by dispirited voters in angry street protests. Young people packed their bags. As in the euro zone, the International Monetary Fund parachuted in with a bailout.

Its currency devalued by half. That boosted exports, like Mr. Palsson's fish, and trimmed costly imports, like cars. The weakened krona was hard on homeowners who borrowed in foreign currency, but Iceland's judges and policy makers orchestrated mortgage relief. Expensive foreign goods also ignited inflation. Consumer prices have risen 26% since 2008.

That rescue, in turn, weighed on the financial system. But unlike Ireland, for example, Iceland let its banks fail and made foreign creditors, not Icelandic taxpayers, largely responsible for covering losses.

Iceland also imposed draconian capital controls—anathema to the European Union doctrine of open financial borders—that have warded off the terrifying capital and credit flights that hit Greece, Ireland and Portugal, and now test Spain and Italy.

And instead of rushing into the sort of spending cuts that have ravaged Greece and Spain, Iceland delayed austerity. Initially, the country even increased social-welfare payments to its poorest citizens, whose continued spending helped cushion the economy.

Amazing how that works...
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't see whole article.

Its currency devalued by half. That boosted exports, like Mr. Palsson's fish, and trimmed costly imports, like cars. The weakened krona was hard on homeowners who borrowed in foreign currency, but Iceland's judges and policy makers orchestrated mortgage relief. Expensive foreign goods also ignited inflation. Consumer prices have risen 26% since 2008.

That rescue, in turn, weighed on the financial system. But unlike Ireland, for example, Iceland let its banks fail and made foreign creditors, not Icelandic taxpayers, largely responsible for covering losses.

Iceland also imposed draconian capital controls—anathema to the European Union doctrine of open financial borders—that have warded off the terrifying capital and credit flights that hit Greece, Ireland and Portugal, and now test Spain and Italy.

I find this section much more interesting than the bolded part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was some congressman saying here how unemployment was a good investment because of someone being able to buy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The biggest thing was the devaluation of their currency, I'd say. And that's what's really hurting Greece, Ireland, Italy, and Spain.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good for them. But Iceland has an population and economy smaller than Charlotte. Any comparison between them and the US or them and the Eurozone (which btw they decided to join, a huge factor in their recovery) is not really relevant imo.

I do agree about the currency though. I think the greeks especially were hurt by their entry into the Eurozone and their inability to manipulate their currency.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is awesome. Why haven't we already followed suit?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is awesome. Why haven't we already followed suit?

Short opinionated answer ?

Unions/Big Banks dumping billions into campaigns on both sides/Failure of Leadership in Gov (top to bottom---- R to D)

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be moronic of the entire world to not follow Iceland's lead. Just shows how corrupt the western governments are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Be careful... When you start wanting and believing in things like this, you get on the slippery slope right into the rabbit hole that many of you accuse some of us here of being in...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • you don't need rock hard facts to reasonably comment on what Nunes has done of late.   WH went to Nunes with a goal to distract away from where the House Intel Committee was going and the direction it was going with it all out in the public.   Nunes did just that.  He shut things down on the WH behalf so they could then figure out there next moves.  Because they know what Yates and company following up Comey would lead to. Eyeball test should tell any right left or middle person that Nunes is at this point not doing an investigation but doing the WH's bidding.  The fact he talks like a lying 8 yr old and acting totally out of character in how he has handled himself speaks volumes.       you want to know what people are so interested in everything? Because Trump and company are LITERALLY doing a coverup right now.  They aren't really hiding that.  They may technically have Spicer say it is outrageous and say stuff in the media.....but there ACTIONS are actually pretty obvious and bold IMO.  So it is only reasonable to want to know what it is they are covering up.   Because really Trump and company are the ones telling people there is something.  
    • Well two of those players are off our draft board so I'm going to give this a no