Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

3 Dead in Oregon Mall Shooting Spree **Republican tears pages 8-12**


  • Please log in to reply
201 replies to this topic

#161 GOOGLE RON PAUL

GOOGLE RON PAUL

    fleet-footed poster

  • Joined: 06-August 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,522
  • Reputation: 1,262
HUDDLER

Posted 12 December 2012 - 10:03 PM

I'm not banning you. I'm telling you to not use racial slurs.


what about homophobic slurs

#162 YourMomsLover

YourMomsLover

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 15-February 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,899
  • Reputation: 229
HUDDLER

Posted 12 December 2012 - 10:04 PM

yes truly you are a victim


Where is your "papaw"? Honest question.

#163 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 24,848
  • Reputation: 5,760
Moderators

Posted 12 December 2012 - 10:04 PM

Slurs in general

#164 YourMomsLover

YourMomsLover

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 15-February 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,899
  • Reputation: 229
HUDDLER

Posted 12 December 2012 - 10:07 PM

Slurs in general


But you can call every conservative in the world a "bigot" "racist" redneck" all you want right?

#165 YourMomsLover

YourMomsLover

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 15-February 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,899
  • Reputation: 229
HUDDLER

Posted 12 December 2012 - 10:10 PM

Lol @ Panthro wanting to ban people with different beliefs. Panthro will call you racist before he can pronounce the "R" in racist.

#166 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 24,848
  • Reputation: 5,760
Moderators

Posted 12 December 2012 - 10:10 PM

Just ones that usual racial slurs

#167 GOOGLE RON PAUL

GOOGLE RON PAUL

    fleet-footed poster

  • Joined: 06-August 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,522
  • Reputation: 1,262
HUDDLER

Posted 12 December 2012 - 10:11 PM

But you can call every conservative in the world a "bigot" "racist" redneck" all you want right?


this argument doesn't work well when you've already dropped ethnic and homophobic slurs in this very thread. calling you a bigot or a racist isn't a "slur" when you've confirmed it yourself.

#168 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 24,848
  • Reputation: 5,760
Moderators

Posted 12 December 2012 - 10:13 PM

Lol @ Panthro wanting to ban people with different beliefs. Panthro will call you racist before he can pronounce the "R" in racist.


Different beliefs....no



bypassing filters to use racial slurs...

#169 Bronn

Bronn

    Sellsword

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,206
  • Reputation: 1,479
HUDDLER

Posted 12 December 2012 - 10:16 PM

Several things to say here, as this is a perfect example of how it sucks to be directly in the middle of the argument at hand... and this country's political system...

YML, you're fuging dumb for using a racial slur. I get it that you are pro-gun, as am I, but you aren't doing yourself (or people like me who are pro-gun) any favors at all by arguing retarded points.

The US Military isn't protecting anyone. They are acting on bullshit puppetmaster orders and being drones in a world struggle for power. Even your paw paw or whatever the fug you want to call him did the same thing, and bragging about his company just makes you sound like another eventual perpetrator in the game of greed and power that forces military action in the first place. You, nor he, are better than anyone else, and you, nor he, has worked any harder than most people.

Take off your American flag blindfold and see this country for what it is... Ask a Native American how good the Constitution is, or the US military.

You've given ample evidence of how easily something is turned into a "libs vs. me" shouting match... Now, do yourself and your reputation a favor and just shut up.

gospodin...

I'm not one of those who cling to the "well regulated militia" aspect of the Constitution. I know there are tons of them, and the vilification of gun lovers is often well deserved. I also understand the argument folks are making in this thread about assault weapons (even though in NC it takes a lot to get fully automatic ones) and I can agree that not everyone should have them (even in the semi-automatic versions). But at the same time, there are people that should be able to. People collect all kinds of things, and some people simply like guns. Those same people can, more often than not, be very responsible with them.

I personally have no desire to be part of a well regulated militia. I just want to be able to possess something that I can enjoy on my own time, while being responsible and safe with it. I admire the way the mechanics and processes of firearms work. To an extent, it is almost an art form.

Yes I know it can be deadly. But so are a lot of things people do responsibly.

I really am caught in the middle. But, the ultimate conclusion I have come to, as with a lot of things, is that I want the government to leave me the fug alone so long as I am being a responsible, upstanding citizen.

Bad apple legislation doesn't allow for that.

#170 YourMomsLover

YourMomsLover

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 15-February 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,899
  • Reputation: 229
HUDDLER

Posted 12 December 2012 - 10:17 PM

this argument doesn't work well when you've already dropped ethnic and homophobic slurs in this very thread. calling you a bigot or a racist isn't a "slur" when you've confirmed it yourself.


You took offense to them. Nuff said.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users