Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Nfl.com Writer Mentions Our Future


  • Please log in to reply
43 replies to this topic

#11 Chimera

Chimera

    Not Bant

  • Joined: 11-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 11,708
  • Reputation: 2,645
HUDDLER

Posted 19 December 2012 - 10:30 PM

LaFell is a solid possession receiver. He and Olsen can be awesome in the short passing game. We need another deep threat to make it work, though. Coughgettiscough.

#12 Marguide

Marguide

    South of the Border

  • Joined: 13-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,748
  • Reputation: 2,344
HUDDLER

Posted 19 December 2012 - 10:52 PM

Lafell is already a good number 2. Too many of you think absurdly unrealistically like most teams run around with White/Jones or Fitz/Bolden-esq duos at receiver.

This.


Yeah, why in the world would we ever want to have a top notch receiving corps? Let's just settle for okay.

Many people, myself included, think bringing in a top notch WR should be a priority this offseason. That would drop LaFell to #3, a role in which he would likely flourish. Then in a couple years when Smith retires, the new guy is #1 and LaFell moves to #2.

#13 TheGreatestOfAllTimeCam

TheGreatestOfAllTimeCam

    Cam Nut Hugger

  • Joined: 27-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,637
  • Reputation: 953
HUDDLER

Posted 19 December 2012 - 10:53 PM

Draft mostly offense please

#14 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 24,874
  • Reputation: 5,780
Moderators

Posted 19 December 2012 - 10:58 PM

Olsen is #2

#15 Panthers Nation

Panthers Nation

    Swaggin on ducks on a daily basis.

  • Joined: 11-August 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 853
  • Reputation: 89
HUDDLER

Posted 19 December 2012 - 11:00 PM

Yeah, why in the world would we ever want to have a top notch receiving corps? Let's just settle for okay.

Many people, myself included, think bringing in a top notch WR should be a priority this offseason. That would drop LaFell to #3, a role in which he would likely flourish. Then in a couple years when Smith retires, the new guy is #1 and LaFell moves to #2.

Agree 100%

Getting a legit WR should be our #1 target this offseason,I would like to target Dwayne Bowe he would be a perfect fit on this team and gives us a jump ball type WR we can use in the redzone.

No Lafell is not a #2 WR yet,he still has games where he doesn't show up and his doesn't really do anything well to be counted on as a #2.He would thrive as the #3 guy though,because all the coverage would be on Smitty/Bowe.

#16 Raskle

Raskle

    Zookeeper

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 2,797
  • Reputation: 394
SUPPORTER

Posted 19 December 2012 - 11:22 PM

LaFell is a solid possession receiver. He and Olsen can be awesome in the short passing game. We need another deep threat to make it work, though. Coughgettiscough.


As he is my adopted Panther, I fully support the coughing in this message.

#17 Dollar Store Dave

Dollar Store Dave

    Formerly Know As Ruff

  • Joined: 27-April 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,964
  • Reputation: 2,590
HUDDLER

Posted 19 December 2012 - 11:26 PM

Lafell is already a good number 2. Too many of you think absurdly unrealistically like most teams run around with White/Jones or Fitz/Bolden-esq duos at receiver.


Truth.

#18 beastson

beastson

    Philly Cheese Steak

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,727
  • Reputation: 1,833
HUDDLER

Posted 19 December 2012 - 11:33 PM

That's not really unrealistic

They chose to draft those players, so they drafted them. Most teams have just a number 1 and stay with that. OL or WR 1st round. If we could get both, thats a W for 2013 draft

#19 jasonluckydog

jasonluckydog

    Honorary Honeydick Member

  • Joined: 28-December 08
  • posts: 13,592
  • Reputation: 3,369
  • LocationGATOR CREEK- SC
SUPPORTER

Posted 19 December 2012 - 11:40 PM

We need whoever finds wr's for the Giants they always plug in some scrub and bam he is a star...

#20 panthers55

panthers55

    Starting all over again

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,421
  • Reputation: 2,152
  • LocationAt the lake
HUDDLER

Posted 19 December 2012 - 11:53 PM

We don't need to bring in a high priced free agent receiver. We just need to draft one in the first round. That way we get a stud for the next 10 years at a bargain price for the first 4 or 5.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users