Jump to content




Photo
- - - - -

walter's latest mock


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
19 replies to this topic

#13 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 20,422
  • Reputation: 5,933
HUDDLER

Posted 09 January 2013 - 11:57 AM

I don't know why he keeps mocking a DT to us, its like the folks that used to mock a TE to us. WE ARE NOT DRAFTING A DT in the first. The miss chance is more likely than QB's.


Not so fast my friend.....


Given a new GM is on his way in, I am not sure that we can use the past tendencies in the draft as a good indicator.

Also....we need a DB bad.......I am on the Take a Safety bandwagon.

#14 CPF4LIFE

CPF4LIFE

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 10-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,781
  • Reputation: 1,496
HUDDLER

Posted 09 January 2013 - 12:02 PM

Warmack is just a all around better prospect and value than Hankins. It would be stupid to take Hankins over him at 14.

#15 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
HUDDLER

Posted 09 January 2013 - 01:48 PM

Not so fast my friend.....


Given a new GM is on his way in, I am not sure that we can use the past tendencies in the draft as a good indicator.

Also....we need a DB bad.......I am on the Take a Safety bandwagon.


Yup, and for the "Ross for GM" fans like myself and may others, NYG has constantly build the DL through the draft and address the OL through FA. What make y'all think Ross would do things differently. That's how and what he was thought to win Championship.

#16 Kurb

Kurb

    I hit it.

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 13,865
  • Reputation: 4,621
Administrators

Posted 09 January 2013 - 02:00 PM

I never like taking a positions b/c its there.


Warmack/DB/a falling OT could produce high dividends at 14 IMO.

I think we might actually trade back TBH.

#17 thunderraiden

thunderraiden

    Thunder God Member

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,870
  • Reputation: 620
HUDDLER

Posted 10 January 2013 - 07:19 PM

Not so fast my friend.....


Given a new GM is on his way in, I am not sure that we can use the past tendencies in the draft as a good indicator.

Also....we need a DB bad.......I am on the Take a Safety bandwagon.

I made an entire post about drafting a DB first a few weeks ago. Have no idea what anyone said as I was drunk when I posted it and didn't feel like looking at the poo storm of "THERE AIN'T NO SAFETY'S WORTH TAKIN IN THE FIRST" I knew had to be there... and were probably right.

#18 Rags

Rags

    help

  • Joined: 20-April 09
  • posts: 2,682
  • Reputation: 1,151
SUPPORTER

Posted 10 January 2013 - 08:01 PM

we need an upgrade across from smith so let's draft a WR in the 4th round from Louisiana Tech!

#19 Kuech the Sneak

Kuech the Sneak

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 16-October 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,730
  • Reputation: 1,096
HUDDLER

Posted 10 January 2013 - 09:35 PM

He updated It after lewan said he was going back to school
1. Richardson
2. Thomas
4. Patton

#20 Dash Global

Dash Global

    Member

  • Joined: 12-November 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,050
  • Reputation: 139
HUDDLER

Posted 10 January 2013 - 10:50 PM

Patton in the 4th, thats a joke. He will be gone by 3rd.