Jump to content


Photo
* * * - - 2 votes

Did Richardson sell part of the team?


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 NCstoner420

NCstoner420

    Dave's not here man

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,387 posts

Posted 09 January 2013 - 05:52 PM

He owns 48% of the franchise, was there a time he owned more than 50% or has it always been 48%?

#2 Doc Holiday

Doc Holiday

    NON FACETE NOBIS CALCITRARE VESTRVM PERINAEVM

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,046 posts

Posted 09 January 2013 - 06:03 PM

There has always been an ownership group, he just has the biggest piece of the pie chart so he's the owner.

#3 G()AT

G()AT

    The Greatest of All Time

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 226 posts

Posted 09 January 2013 - 07:30 PM

lol he said pie chart.

#4 rscott94

rscott94

    Junior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,014 posts

Posted 09 January 2013 - 07:34 PM

lol he said pie chart.


PIE CHARTS?!?!?!?.... We talkin bout PIE CHARTS?!?!?
Posted Image

#5 mountainpantherfan2

mountainpantherfan2

    NOT NEWB

  • NEWB
  • PipPip
  • 79 posts

Posted 09 January 2013 - 07:55 PM

If my memory is correct at least one of his sons and maybe even other family members also own parts of the franshise. But that could have changed when he fired them. I'm not sure.

#6 NCstoner420

NCstoner420

    Dave's not here man

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,387 posts

Posted 09 January 2013 - 07:57 PM

If my memory is correct at least one of his sons and maybe even other family members also own parts of the franshise. But that could have changed when he fired them. I'm not sure.


From what I read the 48% includes all family owned stock.

#7 Marguide

Marguide

    South of the Border

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,683 posts

Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:11 PM

It's surprising if the family ownership isn't greater than 50%. That means the other partners could get together and oust him or his designated heir at any time.

#8 NCstoner420

NCstoner420

    Dave's not here man

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,387 posts

Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:17 PM

It's surprising if the family ownership isn't greater than 50%. That means the other partners could get together and oust him or his designated heir at any time.


I thought the same thing, if someone wanted to move the team out west they technically could.

#9 Boner Champ

Boner Champ

    Future Training Camp MVP

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,464 posts

Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:22 PM

I just hope the other owner isn't Bobcat Johnson

#10 Firefox

Firefox

    This Board Rocks

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 784 posts

Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:31 PM

From what I read the 48% includes all family owned stock.


Yep.

The Big Cat says "I have 14 partners here in town. I own approximately 48 percent of the team, or our family does. And 52 percent is owned by partners."


Read more here: http://www.newsobser...l#storylink=cpy



#11 magnus

magnus

    Eternal Gameface

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,291 posts

Posted 09 January 2013 - 09:20 PM

the list of associate owners isn't current, but included a few top Real Estate guys, the Belk family, Erskine Bowles,

There weren't any bank guys on there (Hugh McColl, etc). Richardson says "or my family does" since each of the siblings and his wife own portions as well.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com