What you guys think about Sheldon Richardson?
#1
Posted 16 January 2013 - 01:11 PM
#2
Posted 16 January 2013 - 01:19 PM
Sheldon Richardson. DT, Mizzou. Very explosive first step with a high motor. Wouldn't mind if we considered him in the 2nd round
I wouldnt mind it either. Problem is he will most likely be gone by then. As of today most consider him a first round guy. It could change though.
#3
Posted 16 January 2013 - 01:37 PM
#4
Posted 16 January 2013 - 02:04 PM
#5
Posted 16 January 2013 - 02:17 PM
#6
Posted 16 January 2013 - 02:25 PM
I, let's say all of us wouldnt mind him in the 2nd. Lol dude he's gone top 20. I wouldn't mind him at 14, but rather have Jesse.
#7
Posted 16 January 2013 - 03:41 PM
#8
Posted 16 January 2013 - 04:10 PM
#9
Posted 16 January 2013 - 04:42 PM
I think we would take one of the bigger DT's instead of Richardson who is smaller. Also, people are saying they like Jesse Williams and everything I've seen on him says we could have a shot at him in the 2nd round.
I think Williams will put up freak numbers at the Combine. While I dont put too much stock in it. I do think it will help solidify him as a 1st rounder.
#10
Posted 16 January 2013 - 06:27 PM
Oh since he is projected to be a 1st round pick that means that automatically is gonna happen..Yes if you think he won't be gone by the end I the first then you haven't done much research my friend
#11
Posted 16 January 2013 - 06:36 PM
#12
Posted 16 January 2013 - 07:58 PM
#13
Posted 16 January 2013 - 11:10 PM
#14
Posted 17 January 2013 - 11:56 AM
Obviously it's not guaranteed but this guy had been compared to JJ Watt. So if someone reached for Poe last year at 11 then this guy should have no problem going first round.Oh since he is projected to be a 1st round pick that means that automatically is gonna happen..
#15
Posted 17 January 2013 - 12:11 PM
Oh since he is projected to be a 1st round pick that means that automatically is gonna happen..
Bro he could very well be the 2nd DT off the board.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





