Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Yaboychris28

What you guys think about Sheldon Richardson?

24 posts in this topic

I think he's pretty overrated. He struggles when teams run right at him, which shouldn't be said about a DT.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we'd be fools to take a DT in the first round (where Richardson will go) when we have such a huge need on the offensive line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Richardson has some character concerns, but not sure what they are. Big Beast52 is right. We need a big body, not a gap slasher. If we go DT, i have a feeling it will be a big body, like Hankins or Jesse Williams.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh since he is projected to be a 1st round pick that means that automatically is gonna happen..

Obviously it's not guaranteed but this guy had been compared to JJ Watt. So if someone reached for Poe last year at 11 then this guy should have no problem going first round.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh since he is projected to be a 1st round pick that means that automatically is gonna happen..

Bro he could very well be the 2nd DT off the board.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we'd be fools to take a DT in the first round (where Richardson will go) when we have such a huge need on the offensive line.

so does Dwan Edwards,he graded out bad on pff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so does Dwan Edwards,he graded out bad on pff.

Cam was the most hit QB when passing from the pocket this season. Dwan Edwards isn't responsible for protecting the future of our franchise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cam was the most hit QB when passing from the pocket this season. Dwan Edwards isn't responsible for protecting the future of our franchise.

you are right, and Cam needs to be protected. i meant to quote the person saying that you could run at Richardson like Dwan was all that good at stopping the run, because he wasnt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you are right, and Cam needs to be protected. i meant to quote the person saying that you could run at Richardson like Dwan was all that good at stopping the run, because he wasnt.

That's why we don't need another DT with that skillset, we need one that can hold up in the run game. Plus dwan wasn't nearly as bad as what Ive seen from richardson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's why we don't need another DT with that skillset, we need one that can hold up in the run game. Plus dwan wasn't nearly as bad as what Ive seen from richardson

Dwan is a 8 year vet, and FA. Richardson is still young, will get stronger, and can be taught the proper technique to handle runs at him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Same people defending Hillary a few months ago are now drawing the conclusion that Flynn... and by association Trump... must be guilty of something because Flynn is getting immunity from the FBI. Works both ways. For the record... IMHO both Hillary and Trump are crooks.  If justice in this nation were truly blind these two politicians and their henchmen would be doing a long stretch in prison by now.
    • Slot receivers don't exist in 2 TE sets unless we're lining a TE on the outside which I haven't seen much out of the currently constructed Panthers. Maybe McCaffrey if he were to be split out wide but the Panthers usually keep a RB with Cam in-case Cam needs the extra protection and audibles the RB to block.  The Panthers would be best suited pairing KB with a speedster such as Charles Johnson, who's adept at running deep routes. Keep Howard and possible the RB (if not blocking) on short routes, KB on working the intermediate routes, Olsen running intermediate/deep routes, and Johnson running deep routes. That way Cam has a receiver on every level. All of this assumes Shula constructs a properly worked passing attack. 
    • Yes, that is correct. My point being Clinton was impeached and stayed in office. Almost everyone calling for impeachment of Trump thinks it means to remove him from office. He would have to be impeached and then found guilty to do that. The impeachment alone does not remove him. And my original point, no one was bringing up the electoral college back then. It makes no sense. Because the popular would surely rid us of corrupt politicians, right?