Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Why are AR-15's 'Personal Defense' Weapons for the DHS but 'Assault Rifles' for Citizens?


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 CatofWar

CatofWar

    Join, or Die

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,462 posts
  • LocationGitmo

Posted 29 January 2013 - 12:22 PM

------


"We are fast approaching the stage of ultimate inversion: the stage where government is free to do as it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission." - Ayn Rand

Activist Post

Why are fully-automatic AR-15s with 30-round magazines and hollow-point bullets called 'personal defense' weapons when the Department of Homeland Security purchases them, but semi-auto AR-15s are assault rifles in the hands of citizens?

The Department of Homeland Security filed a purchase bid this past June titled "Personal Defense Weapons Solicitation". It is combined bid for 5.56x45mm NATO ammunition and "select-fire firearm suitable for personal defense."

Increasingly the government is giving itself privileges that they are taking away from citizens. This is becoming most obvious in regards to gun rights, but it's becoming a widespread abuse of power across all aspects of society. The government is supposed to derive its authority from the people not the other way around.




Ron Paul recently addressed this exact topic proposing the simple solution: "Anything the government assumes they have a right to do to us, we should assume we have a right to do that to them."

If we are to be a nation of, by and for the people where the government has no rights that aren't afforded to citizens, then this assumption may be the check on government overreach that's so desperately needed.

By the way, the DHS is only authorized to work within the U.S. borders, so who do they plan to use these weapons on?

Watch the brief video below covering a bit more detail on the DHS purchase order:

http://www.activistp...eapons.html?m=1

------

#2 Cary Kollins

Cary Kollins

    keep lbing

  • ALL-PRO
  • 6,673 posts
  • LocationWinston-Salem, NC

Posted 29 January 2013 - 12:29 PM

"By the way, the DHS is only authorized to work within the U.S. borders, so who do they plan to use these weapons on?"


How about on the US-Mexican border where DHS agents face off against drug cartels.

#3 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 12,559 posts

Posted 29 January 2013 - 12:54 PM

Posted Image

#4 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • ALL-PRO
  • 23,334 posts

Posted 29 January 2013 - 09:47 PM

Why are F-16s "National Defense Systems" for the Military, but "Insanely dangerous and unnecessary" for the general population? AYN RAND!

#5 Kevin Greene

Kevin Greene

    _RUN FOZZY RUN_

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,339 posts

Posted 30 January 2013 - 01:20 AM

Posted Image

#6 GOOGLE RON PAUL

GOOGLE RON PAUL

    fleet-footed poster

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,181 posts

Posted 30 January 2013 - 03:33 AM

There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com