Lions Release G Stephen Peterman
#1
Posted 05 February 2013 - 02:10 PM
#2
Posted 05 February 2013 - 02:16 PM
#3
Posted 05 February 2013 - 02:22 PM
#4
Posted 05 February 2013 - 02:23 PM
#5
Posted 05 February 2013 - 02:26 PM
and so it begins
yeah it always drives me crazy too every offseason when posters enter every thread with comments like
"WELCUM TO THE OFFZEAZON!" and "AHAHAHHA HERE WE GO!!!" or some equally stupid variation
#6
Posted 05 February 2013 - 02:36 PM
Stud: That was the best we’ve seen Gosder Cherilus (+26.3) look, but, like the line in general, a lot of that came courtesy of not giving up much in pass protection, as opposed to mauling guys in the run game.
Dud: The run blocking from Stephen Peterman (-8.4) was as good as anyone on the team, but it’s inexcusable for a guard in that passing attack to get beat for 45 quarterback disruptions.
Summary: They work well with their quarterback to ensure he’s largely given enough time to make plays in the pocket. They don’t work quite so well with their running backs. They’re far from terrible, and got a boost when Riley Reiff was in on the play, but, with the guys they have behind them, they need to do more.
https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2013/01/28/ranking-the-2012-offensive-lines/4/
#7
Posted 05 February 2013 - 03:04 PM
From PPF's ranking of O-Lines:
https://www.profootb...ensive-lines/4/
do you know if they have a zone read style run offense or not?
Just trying to see if he would be better in a system similar to ours or not.
#8
Posted 05 February 2013 - 03:05 PM
#9
Posted 05 February 2013 - 03:11 PM
#10
Posted 05 February 2013 - 03:27 PM
#11
Posted 05 February 2013 - 03:27 PM
#12
Posted 05 February 2013 - 03:29 PM
As to Peterman, reading the analysis of him makes me wary.
#13
Posted 05 February 2013 - 03:33 PM
I'm only in favor of signing Gosder if we can also get Zuul.
#14
Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:31 PM
do you know if they have a zone read style run offense or not?
Hellllll to the no...
#15
Posted 05 February 2013 - 11:31 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





