Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Hypothetically in a 3-4


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
19 replies to this topic

#13 mwright350

mwright350

    Thy Jimmies shall be Rustled

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 1,688
  • Reputation: 357
SUPPORTER

Posted 06 February 2013 - 09:11 PM

Dear lord man - could we sticky a "why we will not transition to a 3-4" thread so this drivel will stop coming up?

Just because you have four good 4-3 backers you do not magically have four good 3-4 backers. Every LB and line spot is different in a 3-4 than a 4-3.

We do not have the personnel to run a 3-4.
We do not have the personnel to run a 3-4.
We do not have the personnel to run a 3-4.

No matter how much hard people try this will not change.

I just don't get it.

#14 carpantherfan84

carpantherfan84

    Abductive Reasoner

  • Joined: 27-December 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,732
  • Reputation: 462
HUDDLER

Posted 06 February 2013 - 09:36 PM

while our LB corps may not be ideal for a 3-4, Hardy and Johnson have proven all season that they do well on the inside. Especially on passing downs. Whether you guys want to admit it or not, Rivera is a 3-4 coach. Also this is potentially a rebuilding year and that could mean that Beason, Anderson or Heaven forbid, even Davis could be on his way out. I know all us old heads are used to a Panthers organization that pretty much doesn't change, but this is a new era. Organizations do change unexpectedly and at unexpected times. So get off your high horse.

#15 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • Joined: 10-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,955
  • Reputation: 3,465
HUDDLER

Posted 06 February 2013 - 10:19 PM

Sweet bleeding Jesus Fucking Christ.

#16 RufftownRepresent

RufftownRepresent

    Formerly Know As Ruff

  • Joined: 27-April 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,082
  • Reputation: 2,694
HUDDLER

Posted 06 February 2013 - 11:06 PM

Dear lord man - could we sticky a "why we will not transition to a 3-4" thread so this drivel will stop coming up?

Just because you have four good 4-3 backers you do not magically have four good 3-4 backers. Every LB and line spot is different in a 3-4 than a 4-3.

We do not have the personnel to run a 3-4.
We do not have the personnel to run a 3-4.
We do not have the personnel to run a 3-4.

No matter how much hard people try this will not change.

I just don't get it.


I'm not suggesting we do switch to a 34, but after seeing the Colts go from a 43 to a solid 34 in one year, I'm convinced almost any team could pull it off, given that the coaching staff has the know-how.

#17 Corporal Casto

Corporal Casto

    Noob Member

  • Joined: 12-December 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 558
  • Reputation: 165
HUDDLER

Posted 07 February 2013 - 02:37 AM

We must first trade up and draft Sandcastle with our first pick.

#18 GoCarolina8990

GoCarolina8990

    All Day

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,463
  • Reputation: 955
HUDDLER

Posted 07 February 2013 - 09:54 AM

Anyone with a "we dont have the personal" response is full of fuging bullshit

#19 Happy Panther

Happy Panther

    Now even funnier.

  • Joined: 16-March 09
  • posts: 18,507
  • Reputation: 3,471
SUPPORTER

Posted 09 February 2013 - 05:40 PM

http://espn.go.com/n...ts-work-1-month

Saints moving to a 3-4 under Rob Ryan.

#20 SOJA

SOJA

    Official Panthers Fan

  • Joined: 09-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,818
  • Reputation: 1,950
HUDDLER

Posted 09 February 2013 - 05:48 PM

I've stated this before, James Anderson would be a MLB in a 3-4, Davis would be an extremely undersized OLB in a 3-4. So essentially we have 4 3-4 MLB's ..... our OLB's would likely be Alexander and Charles Johnson. no way this becomes our permanent defense, we may show looks on passing situations - but that could just be a different blitzing scheme.


in essence stop trying to make the 3-4 happen its not