Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Ideally which position do you want filled in the 1st round?


  • Please log in to reply
63 replies to this topic

Poll: Draft question (105 member(s) have cast votes)

Perfect world; Position you'd address in round round 1

  1. DT (21 votes [20.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

  2. WR (33 votes [31.43%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 31.43%

  3. CB (11 votes [10.48%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 10.48%

  4. FS (6 votes [5.71%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.71%

  5. Offensive Tackle (24 votes [22.86%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 22.86%

  6. Offensive Guard (10 votes [9.52%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 9.52%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#16 Kevin Greene

Kevin Greene

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,587 posts

Posted 20 February 2013 - 10:25 PM

BPA out of WR,OL,DL.


That works for me.

#17 pantherclaw

pantherclaw

    Wise Ass

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,466 posts
  • LocationGalveston

Posted 20 February 2013 - 10:28 PM

I don't care.

Want the BPA.

#18 pantherclaw

pantherclaw

    Wise Ass

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,466 posts
  • LocationGalveston

Posted 20 February 2013 - 10:29 PM

I don't care.

Want the BPA.

#19 pantherclaw

pantherclaw

    Wise Ass

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,466 posts
  • LocationGalveston

Posted 20 February 2013 - 10:29 PM

I don't care.

Want the BPA.

#20 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Moderators
  • -29,825 posts

Posted 20 February 2013 - 10:33 PM

It's hard to throw to a receiver when you're laying on your back

it's hard for an oline to block for a QB that can't find open receivers. expecting them to block defenses for 5 seconds is a bit much.

#21 KJ89

KJ89

    bottom line

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,856 posts
  • LocationCharlotte

Posted 20 February 2013 - 10:57 PM

WR.

#22 TruthVsComfort

TruthVsComfort

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 421 posts

Posted 20 February 2013 - 10:59 PM

I think it is easier to find starting caliber oline help in the 2nd--4th rounds than it is to find a #1WR in the 2nd--4th rounds. I would not mind seeing WR in the 1st and OL in the 2nd (although we probably need to go FS).

#23 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,847 posts
  • LocationNonya

Posted 20 February 2013 - 11:19 PM

It depends on FA but bpa Secondary, DT, Oline then WR.

A dominate DT playing beside Hardy and CJ makes every team's QB we face a victim.

#24 SOJA

SOJA

    Official Panthers Fan

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,283 posts

Posted 20 February 2013 - 11:35 PM

all positions being equal I'd take WR, then S...it's easier to find journey O-line and D-line to act as stop gaps

#25 Riverboat Ron

Riverboat Ron

    The Gambler

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,063 posts

Posted 20 February 2013 - 11:43 PM

Ideally I want Eric Fisher, but since there's a better chance Hell would freeze over, I went with Chance Warmack.

1. Chance Warmack OG (Could go very high or be available.)
2. Sharrif Floyd DT (Probably will rise to be a top 10 or even top 5 pick, likely won't be availaible.)
3. Cordarrelle Patterson WR (Might still be on the board, but possibly gone by #14)
4. Lane Johnson OT (Like his potential, might go to the Chargers at #11)
5. Kenny Vaccaro FS (Not high on taking a FS this high, but if everyone else is gone he's bpa in my opinion)

#26 scarface

scarface

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,035 posts
  • LocationEastern NC

Posted 20 February 2013 - 11:55 PM

DT (Star, Richardson, Floyd) or WR (Patterson, Allen)

#27 panthers55

panthers55

    Starting all over again

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,505 posts
  • LocationAt the lake

Posted 21 February 2013 - 12:10 AM

Polls like this are stupid even for the off-season because the assumptions are unrealistic. Exactly how can we assume that a draft pick who has never played a down in the NFL will be rated as a perennial all pro. And exactly when do we pick players in the draft just based on talent without considering factors like differences in cost to pick up in free agency. For example if it comes down to WR or OT, you go with OT because cheap OTs especially left tackles are hard to find and expensive. This year by contrast there will likely be a number of WRs who will be cheaper to sign and proven. Then there is the whole issue of which positions are easiest to star right away versus those guys who need time to mature. For example, how many WRs contribute significantly in their rookie year versus those who need a year to mature like Michael Crabtree or Dez Bryant versus a Julio Jones. Then there is the whole bust rate which varies greatly by position. For example, OT busts at a lower rate than WR or DT/DE for example.

Given all these factors you would go OT and corner before you go WR.

#28 jayflip

jayflip

    vaya con dios

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,681 posts
  • LocationSan Diego

Posted 21 February 2013 - 01:52 AM

I don't care.

Want the BPA.

#29 jayflip

jayflip

    vaya con dios

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,681 posts
  • LocationSan Diego

Posted 21 February 2013 - 01:52 AM

I don't care.

Want the BPA.

#30 jayflip

jayflip

    vaya con dios

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,681 posts
  • LocationSan Diego

Posted 21 February 2013 - 01:53 AM

Sorry PantherClaw, had to do it.





























I don't care.

Want the BPA.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.