Hardy and Lafell
#1
Posted 15 March 2013 - 08:53 AM
#2
Posted 15 March 2013 - 08:54 AM
#3
Posted 15 March 2013 - 09:03 AM
#4
Posted 15 March 2013 - 09:04 AM
Marty Hurney was worse than Matt Millen. Perhaps the worst GM in the NFL aside from Jerry Jones and Al Davis in the 2000s. I hope he does not live in NC any longer because he would be in danger.
#5
Posted 15 March 2013 - 09:07 AM
#6
Posted 15 March 2013 - 09:09 AM
#7
Posted 15 March 2013 - 09:12 AM
given a choice between the two...you do that.At this rate, you let Lafell walk and give Hardy a extension.
lafell is basically moose-lite. if we draft WR well this year, we let lafell move on. don't need to be over-spending for a pretty average receiver.
we gain more by extending hardy.
that said...i don't see us keeping hardy either. he'll be commanding more money...not CJ money, but still more than we should be spending on one position. look at paul kruger's contract as a baseline.
#8
Posted 15 March 2013 - 09:20 AM
#9
Posted 15 March 2013 - 09:36 AM
idiot post, he was a major part of us going to the Super Bowl and a pretty decent run from 2003 -2008Answer: yes, but Lafell better not ask for too much. DWill will be gone, Gross' salary will be cheaper. If Beason has a good, healthy year, he could be dealt.
Marty Hurney was worse than Matt Millen. Perhaps the worst GM in the NFL aside from Jerry Jones and Al Davis in the 2000s. I hope he does not live in NC any longer because he would be in danger.
I know recent history he's been terrible but I cant stand moronic revisionist history.
#10
Posted 15 March 2013 - 09:39 AM
#11
Posted 15 March 2013 - 10:13 AM
Are we going to have enough cap space to sign these guys next year? Well and maybe Byron Bell if he continues to get better?
I ain't gonn lie to ya son. There are a myriad of ways to gain cap space. So the answer is, yes, if we want,
Gettlemen says he wants big guys and TD makers. Hardy qualifies, Lafell, not so much. And Bell better improve like nobodies bidness if he wants another contract.
Hardy is the only player getting a bigish contract next year. Gettlemen will offer him a fair contract. Whether a flake like Hardy will accept it is anyones guess. I say, flake or not, he will want to stay.
Lafell may warrant more than the vet minimum, so this one is up in the air. Again, he will get a fair offer. If he thinks it is fair, he will stay. If he thinks he merits more money, he may test the FA market. I just don't see many teams trying to pry him away with a big money deal. He is good at what he does, but good does not warrant big money anymore.
Bell has almost no chance of being a starter after this year. He will get the vet minimum as depth.
And lastly, not another one of these crappy threads? Search is your friend. Or try actually reading some of the threads on cap space. jk, or am I ?
#12
Posted 15 March 2013 - 10:29 AM
Hardy thinks he is the best DE every. Hate to lose him but he will get his payday elsewhere. Maybe, maybe we can frontload and keep him (hit the year before cams extention), but that is unlikly.
#13
Posted 15 March 2013 - 10:54 AM
#14
Posted 15 March 2013 - 11:22 AM
Cam's contract is coming up any day now.
#15
Posted 15 March 2013 - 11:25 AM
I ain't gonn lie to ya son. There are a myriad of ways to gain cap space. So the answer is, yes, if we want,
Gettlemen says he wants big guys and TD makers. Hardy qualifies, Lafell, not so much. And Bell better improve like nobodies bidness if he wants another contract.
Hardy is the only player getting a bigish contract next year. Gettlemen will offer him a fair contract. Whether a flake like Hardy will accept it is anyones guess. I say, flake or not, he will want to stay.
Lafell may warrant more than the vet minimum, so this one is up in the air. Again, he will get a fair offer. If he thinks it is fair, he will stay. If he thinks he merits more money, he may test the FA market. I just don't see many teams trying to pry him away with a big money deal. He is good at what he does, but good does not warrant big money anymore.
Bell has almost no chance of being a starter after this year. He will get the vet minimum as depth.
And lastly, not another one of these crappy threads? Search is your friend. Or try actually reading some of the threads on cap space. jk, or am I ?
We are the team that finally decided to take a chance on him in the 6th... at that point guys start to get worried if they are even going to get drafted. Rivera (if I were to guess) motivated Hardy the past offseason to get his ass in the weight room to put on some serious beef, and it sure as hell paid dividends. If he has another good year we'll offer him a contract in the 8-11 mil range and he'd be crazy not to take it.
Lafell should be offered 3mil/year. I think that would be a fair amount.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





