Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Depending on rounds 1 and 2, If Swope is in round 4, can we pass?


  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

#11 thunderraiden

thunderraiden

    Thunder God Member

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,849
  • Reputation: 611
HUDDLER

Posted 16 March 2013 - 01:06 PM

No Wes Welker 2.0 comparisons.. I'm proud of you guys.

#12 SmashNDash

SmashNDash

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 04-December 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 593
  • Reputation: 143
HUDDLER

Posted 16 March 2013 - 01:10 PM

I was just checking out Ryan Swope (WR) on YT, and I said to myself, "This guy looks fast!" When I started researching I was somewhat shocked that he had the 2nd fastest time of any WR (Austin, #1).
Swope doesn't have the athleticism of the big boys, but he is solid and could very well be an excellent possession type guy or sneaky downfield threat that lulls defenses to sleep as they worry about Smitty, Olsen and any other emerging threat. Moreover, he looks to be a great red zone option.

With our needs, we probably would have to pass on him, but if he is there in the 5th. We have to take him.



Wow, could you be anymore racist? Guy ran a 4.34, 37 inch vert and 10'05' longjump and he can't be as athletic as your "big boys".

#13 Lumps

Lumps

    Jase is butthurt

  • Joined: 20-October 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,778
  • Reputation: 907
  • LocationSouth Charlotte
HUDDLER

Posted 16 March 2013 - 01:12 PM

looks like wes welker 2.0 to me

#14 DaveThePanther2008

DaveThePanther2008

    Gonna live and die as a faithful Panther Fan

  • Joined: 09-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,624
  • Reputation: 898
  • LocationMelfa
HUDDLER

Posted 16 March 2013 - 01:14 PM

IF is a big word. He will be long gone. We would have to do some wheeling and dealing to get him.

Ready to give up a 2014 #2?

#15 cultclassiccat

cultclassiccat

    flash

  • Joined: 18-March 12
  • posts: 1,741
  • Reputation: 375
  • LocationG spot
SUPPORTER

Posted 16 March 2013 - 01:15 PM

Hard to say really but one thing is for sure, he very well could be a welker 2.0 imo

#16 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 16,815
  • Reputation: 4,787
HUDDLER

Posted 16 March 2013 - 01:35 PM

Little fast white guy? The Patriots will get him in the 7th and turn him into a superstar.

#17 h0llywood

h0llywood

    I HATE LUKE KUECHLY!

  • Joined: 04-September 12
  • posts: 2,955
  • Reputation: 1,636
  • LocationPasadena, CA
SUPPORTER

Posted 16 March 2013 - 02:15 PM

He is 4 inches taller than Wes Welker
Ran .3 seconds faster than Welker at the Combine

Looks every bit like Swope 1.0

#18 DaveThePanther2008

DaveThePanther2008

    Gonna live and die as a faithful Panther Fan

  • Joined: 09-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,624
  • Reputation: 898
  • LocationMelfa
HUDDLER

Posted 16 March 2013 - 02:17 PM

He improved is stock at the combine. I wish we have a 3rd round pick because he would be perfect there for us. But, he will be gone by the forth. It would be a gift if he was there.

#19 Ivan The Awesome

Ivan The Awesome

    Keep Pounding...all the way to...the draft! :D

  • Joined: 11-May 11
  • posts: 10,044
  • Reputation: 2,742
  • LocationNC
SUPPORTER

Posted 16 March 2013 - 02:20 PM

He's a late third round guy, He won't be there when we pick. Too many teams with WR needs before us. If he's there and Zavair Gooden is too. I would go with the latter. Although Swope would be more of a Erick Decker instead of a Wes Welker. He's actually 6' tall, not bad and a 4.3 40? Catches everything too. I don't see why he wouldn't go before the 4th.

#20 MrBubba

MrBubba

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 28-February 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,659
  • Reputation: 193
HUDDLER

Posted 16 March 2013 - 02:28 PM

Swope is gone before fourth. But would love to get him if we don't get another wr in 1 or 2 round


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users