Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Cordarrelle Patterson vs. Tavon Austin


  • Please log in to reply
49 replies to this topic

#21 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
  • LocationNonya
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2013 - 02:53 AM

You're telling me there's Megatron, Fitz, and Johnson in this Draft? Theres only a Welker in this Draft.


No moron I'm asking if you had your choice who would be last one you pick.

#22 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
  • LocationKurby
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2013 - 02:53 AM

Yes pretty much. Anybody who knows football know a #1 needs to be able to line up anywhere.


Yea, just throw Welker out of the no.1 receiver talk. Bury his @ss. There's no possible way he's a no.1. Anyone would be crazy enough to believe he's one. He's just a damn no.3 SLOT guy.

#23 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
  • LocationKurby
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2013 - 02:54 AM

No moron I'm asking if you had your choice who would be last one you pick.



Thats not what we're talking about.
and why do you always start the name calling whenever you cant answer the question anymore?

#24 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
  • LocationNonya
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2013 - 02:57 AM

Thats not what we're talking about.
and why do you always start the name calling whenever you cant answer the question anymore?


I call you that because you're a fuging Moron. No offense.

#25 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
  • LocationKurby
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2013 - 02:57 AM

No moron I'm asking if you had your choice who would be last one you pick.


That's like me asking you this:
So, who would be last on this list for you?
Fitz, Megatron, and Johnson?

Whoever you have "last" is considered "NOT" a no.1. See how retarded that question is. Pretty damn fuggn retarded!

#26 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
  • LocationKurby
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2013 - 02:58 AM

I call you that because you're a fuging Moron. No offense.



I see. Everytime you're losing an argument to me, whoever (wood), you start the name calling. Very classy.

#27 Dash Global

Dash Global

    Member

  • Joined: 12-November 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,050
  • Reputation: 139
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2013 - 03:00 AM

Welker is not a deep threat. He is a chain moving slot wr. A very good one at that.

You like him up on the outside and his value drops imo

#28 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
  • LocationNonya
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2013 - 03:03 AM

That's like me asking you this:
So, who would be last on this list for you?
Fitz, Megatron, and Johnson?

Whoever you have "last" is considered "NOT" a no.1. See how retarded that question is. Pretty damn fuggn retarded!


No not really the point was would you choose the guys who line up everywhere and are deep threats as well as chain movers and medium route players or the guy who lines up always in 1 spot. Is not a deep threat but he does catch a lot ball in the middle areas and is just a chain mover.

#29 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
  • LocationNonya
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2013 - 03:07 AM

I see. Everytime you're losing an argument to me, whoever (wood), you start the name calling. Very classy.


You started this dumb thread. You are comparing 2 different type of WR. It isn't a fair comparison.

You can't Compare a player like Art Monk to Marvin Harrison they are 2 different types of WR. Great in what they do but different.

#30 JawnyBlaze

JawnyBlaze

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • posts: 7,326
  • Reputation: 1,844
SUPPORTER

Posted 24 March 2013 - 03:18 AM

If I had to choose between them with no other options I'd take Austin. He's more of a proven WR and the only advantage Patterson has on him is height. If I'm taking a huge gamble on one of this year's WRs in the 1st, I'll take the one with the bigger playmaking potential.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users