Jump to content




Photo
- - - - -

My case on not listening to anyone case about the drafting any position.


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
66 replies to this topic

#1 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
HUDDLER

Posted 26 March 2013 - 08:40 PM

None of you know what you're talking about or what the panthers plan on doing and will pretty much be wrong on draft day.


The End.

#2 SCP

SCP

    Crop Dusting Son of a Bitch

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 21,528
  • Reputation: 18,005
HUDDLER

Posted 26 March 2013 - 08:44 PM



#3 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
HUDDLER

Posted 26 March 2013 - 08:51 PM

http://youtu.be/wvJ4wh1kwR8



If Forest was in this draft he would be the number 1 rated WR.

#4 Ivan The Awesome

Ivan The Awesome

    Keep Pounding...all the way to...the draft! :D

  • Joined: 11-May 11
  • posts: 10,087
  • Reputation: 2,807
SUPPORTER

Posted 26 March 2013 - 08:52 PM

Deja Vú?

#5 Dex

Dex

    Knight of Sunlight

  • Joined: 25-July 11
  • posts: 7,806
  • Reputation: 7,391
SUPPORTER

Posted 26 March 2013 - 08:55 PM

Well if we don't know what we're talking about that means you don't know what you're talking which would then mean you wouldn't know enough to say we don't know what we're talking about because you don't know what you're talking about.

#6 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
HUDDLER

Posted 26 March 2013 - 08:57 PM

Well if we don't know what we're talking about that means you don't know what you're talking which would then mean you wouldn't know enough to say we don't know what we're talking about because you don't know what you're talking about.


That is a riddle mixed in a question mixed in a enigma there.

#7 TheRumGone

TheRumGone

    mountain man

  • Joined: 06-December 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 11,678
  • Reputation: 9,527
HUDDLER

Posted 26 March 2013 - 08:57 PM

Well if we don't know what we're talking about that means you don't know what you're talking which would then mean you wouldn't know enough to say we don't know what we're talking about because you don't know what you're talking about.


i have no idea what you're talking about.

#8 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
HUDDLER

Posted 26 March 2013 - 08:58 PM

i have no idea what you're talking about.



Rum what came 1st the chicken or the egg?

Wrap your head around that.

#9 Dex

Dex

    Knight of Sunlight

  • Joined: 25-July 11
  • posts: 7,806
  • Reputation: 7,391
SUPPORTER

Posted 26 March 2013 - 09:00 PM

i have no idea what you're talking about.

Well he's saying the Huddle doesn't know what they're talking about. He is part of the Huddle so that includes him. So if he doesn't know what he's talking about then the thread and his opinion are both irrelevant because he doesn't know what he's talking about.

Basically in saying the Huddle doesn't know what they're talking about means that him himself doesn't know what he's talking about.

#10 TheRumGone

TheRumGone

    mountain man

  • Joined: 06-December 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 11,678
  • Reputation: 9,527
HUDDLER

Posted 26 March 2013 - 09:00 PM

Rum what came 1st the chicken or the egg?

Wrap your head around that.


Don't mindfug me i'm drunk.

#11 TheRumGone

TheRumGone

    mountain man

  • Joined: 06-December 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 11,678
  • Reputation: 9,527
HUDDLER

Posted 26 March 2013 - 09:01 PM

Well he's saying the Huddle doesn't know what they're talking about. He is part of the Huddle so that includes him. So if he doesn't know what he's talking about then the thread and his opinion are both irrelevant because he doesn't know what he's talking about.

Basically in saying the Huddle doesn't know what they're talking about means that him himself doesn't know what he's talking about.


I thought i was being clever. Do people here think I'm slow?

#12 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
HUDDLER

Posted 26 March 2013 - 09:04 PM

But we should listen to you why Lafail will be the answer?

#13 SCP

SCP

    Crop Dusting Son of a Bitch

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 21,528
  • Reputation: 18,005
HUDDLER

Posted 26 March 2013 - 09:06 PM

If Forest was in this draft he would be the number 1 rated WR.

Yep and 90% of this board would be drooling over him.

#14 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
HUDDLER

Posted 26 March 2013 - 09:06 PM

Well he's saying the Huddle doesn't know what they're talking about. He is part of the Huddle so that includes him. So if he doesn't know what he's talking about then the thread and his opinion are both irrelevant because he doesn't know what he's talking about.

Basically in saying the Huddle doesn't know what they're talking about means that him himself doesn't know what he's talking about.



Basically we have threads popping up why we won't draft this position or that position. I choose not to care what we do.

#15 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
HUDDLER

Posted 26 March 2013 - 09:09 PM

But we should listen to you why Lafail will be the answer?


I don't give a fug if you listen to me or not. He is still on the roster. Either support him or not.