Jump to content




Photo
- - - - -

T. Austin < or = J. Adams


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
104 replies to this topic

#97 SmashNDash

SmashNDash

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 04-December 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 593
  • Reputation: 143
HUDDLER

Posted 29 March 2013 - 12:41 AM

^^^^^^^^^ I am glad its not the old days, cause I would hate to have to whip ass for being popped because of a post on an internet message board dumbshit.


Posted Image

#98 top dawg

top dawg

    The Creative Cat

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 9,769
  • Reputation: 3,761
HUDDLER

Posted 29 March 2013 - 03:19 AM

^^^^^^^^^ I am glad its not the old days, cause I would hate to have to whip ass for being popped because of a post on an internet message board dumbshit.


Well, now that you mention it, you'd have to whip your own ass for posting the most dumb poo ever.


Stop taking a benign statement and going all tough Internet Guy.

#99 jarhead

jarhead

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,661
  • Reputation: 1,012
HUDDLER

Posted 29 March 2013 - 05:40 AM

Tavon Austin is pretty amazing but I don't see how you guys think he's going to be so great for us. We need a future #1 WR and in my personal opinion we need one now. Austin is 5"8, and before you guys say Steve Smith, just realize that there has literally never been a player like Steve Smith. We can't assume that Austin is going to be able to play like him, to be able to beat double teams and carry an offense. We need a guy with great size and speed who you can be a reliable target, a redzone threat, and a deep threat.

We also just signed Ted Ginn. I think the better draft would be to take Richardson in the 1st and Justin Hunter in the 2nd.
Though I do really like Patterson I share the doubts people have for him.


He does not have to be our future number 1 WR to be great for us.He is a weapon, if he gets over 1000 yards who care if he is a number 1 wr or rb or returner.The guy just works great with a little space ....that is all it is.Other teams will have to account for him.

#100 Who Said What?

Who Said What?

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 21-September 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 864
  • Reputation: 287
HUDDLER

Posted 29 March 2013 - 10:28 AM

Well, now that you mention it, you'd have to whip your own ass for posting the most dumb poo ever.


Stop taking a benign statement and going all tough Internet Guy.


Says the guy who talked about physicality first with his tap on the wrist bullshit. Explain your point with evidence next time and not a cowardly internet moronic attempt to be derogatory hypocrite. I would like to repeat dumbshit for the cheap seats.

#101 top dawg

top dawg

    The Creative Cat

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 9,769
  • Reputation: 3,761
HUDDLER

Posted 29 March 2013 - 12:17 PM

Says the guy who talked about physicality first with his tap on the wrist bullshit. Explain your point with evidence next time and not a cowardly internet moronic attempt to be derogatory hypocrite. I would like to repeat dumbshit for the cheap seats.


What's cowardly is putting on some internet tough guy act because someone disagrees with your basic premise. Adams does not equal Austin, nor is anyone with credibility claiming such an ill-advised comparison. Their stats, particularly in their senior year, are not equal. Their rushing ability is worlds apart. Their TD totals aren't equal. Their return stats are not equal (though Adams had a slightly higher PR avg.). Even if they were, Adams can't hold onto the rock. Then when you compare their speed---combine or on the field---Austin obviously has another gear. Throw in explosiveness, dynamic ability, and just overall value to their respective offenses at a collegiate level, there really is no comparison.

http://www.sports-re...oe-adams-1.html
http://www.sports-re...n-austin-1.html

In regards to your dumbshit comment, dumbass, you want to escalate until we get banned? Nuns popping kids' knuckles back in the day hardly equates to a level of physicality that warrants my comments to even be considered as a threat. I ain't no little meek child that will put up with your internet bravado, tough guy bullshit.

#102 Who Said What?

Who Said What?

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 21-September 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 864
  • Reputation: 287
HUDDLER

Posted 29 March 2013 - 12:30 PM

What's cowardly is putting on some internet tough guy act because someone disagrees with your basic premise. Adams does not equal Austin, nor is anyone with credibility claiming such an ill-advised comparison. Their stats, particularly in their senior year, are not equal. Their rushing ability is worlds apart. Their TD totals aren't equal. Their return stats are not equal (though Adams had a slightly higher PR avg.). Even if they were, Adams can't hold onto the rock. Then when you compare their speed---combine or on the field---Austin obviously has another gear. Throw in explosiveness, dynamic ability, and just overall value to their respective offenses at a collegiate level, there really is no comparison.

http://www.sports-re...oe-adams-1.html
http://www.sports-re...n-austin-1.html

In regards to your dumbshit comment, dumbass, you want to escalate until we get banned? Nuns popping kids' knuckles back in the day hardly equates to a level of physicality that warrants my comments to even be considered as a threat. I ain't no little meek child that will put up with your internet bravado, tough guy bullshit.


I don"t want to get banned. Instead, let's get cerebral!

#103 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,648
  • Reputation: 8,121
Moderators

Posted 29 March 2013 - 12:55 PM

Regardless of how he compares, we aren't taking him at 14.

i don't think you can definitively say that.

he is most definitely a possibility there, one of quite a few from a few different positions. the interest is there for sure.

#104 csx

csx

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 31-December 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,062
  • Reputation: 2,409
HUDDLER

Posted 29 March 2013 - 01:13 PM

I think he'd be more likely in a trade down situation. You are correct, I just couldn't find anyone suggesting he would be taken that early....until I looked a little harder

#105 top dawg

top dawg

    The Creative Cat

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 9,769
  • Reputation: 3,761
HUDDLER

Posted 29 March 2013 - 01:45 PM

I think he'd be more likely in a trade down situation. You are correct, I just couldn't find anyone suggesting he would be taken that early....until I looked a little harder


And not only is he moving up the draft boards, but now there is talk that the 49ers, Vikings, and possibly even the Patriots moving up to take him. I will give him his due: he is the talk of the 2013 NFL draft. Makes me wonder even more if we are giving him serious consideration. But, if we can pick up a first and that third round pick, then we may pull the trigger if Austin is still on the board.

I never thought that Austin might have to fall to us, but perhaps the true value is there amidst all the smoke(screens).