Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

McShay 2 Round Mock


  • Please log in to reply
91 replies to this topic

#31 TANTRIC-NINJA

TANTRIC-NINJA

    The Yumbo of the Huddle

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,723
  • Reputation: 2,198
  • LocationColumbia, South Kacky
HUDDLER

Posted 28 March 2013 - 01:49 PM

Its usually BPA and obvious need = DT or TE( in the Fox days).

They are not predictions of the certain future just a tool to see who will be availibe in a logical need scheme standpoint. The best miss more than hit so relax..

Slyvester Williams was remocked to us on NFP's draft.

Stated that Williams has not been famous on early mocks but is high on quite a few draft boards.

After the LSU pro Days Vaccaro is now falling making way to Crypien and Eric Reid(who blew scouts away)

Russ Lande's top 200 board(yes he has Ryan Nassib as the top guy-must be his nephew)
http://www.nationalf...Version-90.html

Mock draft
http://www.nationalf...Version-90.html


#32 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,898
  • Reputation: 7,795
Moderators

Posted 28 March 2013 - 01:49 PM

Maybe but who knows how Gettleman runs a draft. Maybe he's all smokescreeens. Wouldn't be the first time teams have meet with a bunch of guys they have no intention of picking just to make sure a guy they do want drops.

This draft has a number of good quality players around both our 1st and 2nd round pick. They also happen to be players that are a need for us. DT, CB, WR.

I wonder what Gettleman's draft philosophy will be. Does he reach for a player of need? How likely is he to trade up or down in a draft? Etc.

lot's of questions, for sure, but i do think the one thing that isn't one is about us drafting someone in the first round we haven't met with. i just don't see it happening.

first two rounds are more than likely going to be some combo of DL or WR...maybe secondary.

#33 Fan01

Fan01

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 13-September 10
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 685
  • Reputation: 413
HUDDLER

Posted 28 March 2013 - 01:50 PM

I'm torn, while I'd like to get another 3 tech to play with Dwan, I'd also like to go ahead and fill the NT need since it's an immediate concern.

I haven't watched a lot of Richardson, but most of what I've heard from the talking heads is very good. If I'm not mistaken, Warren Sapp was listed as an explosive 3 tech who needed a lot of work against the run.



Same here. I like Richardson but I'm not in love with him. On the other hand I've asked Star Lotulelei to marry me but I don't think he'll drop that far.

Is he worth going up a few spots to get if he starts to drop. If the Panthers didn't have so many needs I'd say yes and sadly it'd probably take a lot more than an extra 4th to move up 2 or 3 spots.

A lot of reports are comparing him to Ngata of the Ravens and imagine our D-line with a monster like that on the inside.

#34 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,898
  • Reputation: 7,795
Moderators

Posted 28 March 2013 - 02:01 PM

Same here. I like Richardson but I'm not in love with him. On the other hand I've asked Star Lotulelei to marry me but I don't think he'll drop that far.

Is he worth going up a few spots to get if he starts to drop. If the Panthers didn't have so many needs I'd say yes and sadly it'd probably take a lot more than an extra 4th to move up 2 or 3 spots.

A lot of reports are comparing him to Ngata of the Ravens and imagine our D-line with a monster like that on the inside.

holy crap i don't want us moving up in the first for anyone.

move back or not at all.

no more mortgaging the future, please. we need more picks, not less.

#35 carpanfan96

carpanfan96

    play hard, hit harder

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • posts: 11,995
  • Reputation: 962
  • LocationLexington, NC
SUPPORTER

Posted 28 March 2013 - 02:04 PM

Richardson wouldn't really play much year one I don't think, pretty sure that Dwan would be starting so why draft a 3 tech that's not going to see a bunch of playing time????? Yes, Richardson with his size is a 3 tech only. The big team weakness at DT is with NT, not UT. Stupid pick. If your going to mock a DT to the Panther's at least pick the right damn kind that fits the teams needs.

Don't mind Hunter in the second round at all, good pick.

#36 Kuech the Sneak

Kuech the Sneak

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 16-October 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,433
  • Reputation: 993
HUDDLER

Posted 28 March 2013 - 02:07 PM

He also had 75 tackles leading his team which is unheard of for a DT. Plus got to the backfield constantly against the best Olines in the the country. If they kept QB pressures as a stat in college like they do in the pro's he would lead all DT in that.


Didn't see him get that much pressure, he's so overrated. Gets a lot of tackles down field cuz he gets pushed back and has the speed to catch them, doesn't mean he's good against the run

#37 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
  • LocationNonya
HUDDLER

Posted 28 March 2013 - 03:30 PM

Didn't see him get that much pressure, he's so overrated. Gets a lot of tackles down field cuz he gets pushed back and has the speed to catch them, doesn't mean he's good against the run


Then you haven't been watching film on him. Dude is always in the backfield.

#38 SauceBoss

SauceBoss

    IT IS WHAT IT IS

  • Joined: 20-September 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,294
  • Reputation: 356
  • LocationGreenville, SC
HUDDLER

Posted 28 March 2013 - 03:53 PM

b/c there's less of a chance that Tavon Austin won't be a bust.

#39 Leeroy Jenkins PhD

Leeroy Jenkins PhD

    HCIC

  • Joined: 24-January 10
  • posts: 2,078
  • Reputation: 1,030
  • LocationHouston Texas
SUPPORTER

Posted 28 March 2013 - 04:09 PM

I want to know who Hurney takes in the first and second rounds. We stick with his 1st round choice and make sure we do not draft his second.

#40 Woodie

Woodie

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,214
  • Reputation: 143
HUDDLER

Posted 28 March 2013 - 04:48 PM

lot's of questions, for sure, but i do think the one thing that isn't one is about us drafting someone in the first round we haven't met with. i just don't see it happening.

first two rounds are more than likely going to be some combo of DL or WR...maybe secondary.

We really don't know if we've met with him or not. In fact, I'd almost bet that we at least talked to him at the combine and had a reresentative at his pro day. Not all meetings get out...usually depends on the agent, and I haven't heard much from Richardson's. Also, if you remember, Beason said that prior to being drafted by us, he had heard barely a word from the Panthers and had no idea they had any interest. Of course that was a different regime, but just points out that teams can often make draft decisions based on tape, scouting reports, and reasearch without much direct contact.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users