Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

jarhead

Takeo Spikes says Woodson could win us 3 games

Recommended Posts

Yaboychris28    1,262

Im gonna play devils advocate and say that Woodson wouldn't be all that much help. Who's to say that he would have made the play against Atlanta? He's not the same player he was. Doesn't matter how many all pro selections you have if you dont have the ability anymore.

 

That said I'd like to have him because he probably would be an upgrade but I don't think he guarantees us any wins.

So you're saying just because Woodson is past his prime he wouldn't have been able to knock down that pass?  Woodsons football awareness and positioning would have been enough to make that play. Intangibles like that do not just go away because your'e a few years past your prime, I think he would definitely be an upgrade of what we have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MadHatter    9,501

Come on Getts, get out there and be somebody!!  Don't let the Raiders bid you up.  Give Woody the deal he can't walk away from, if he tries to leave "explain" the situation to him again!

 Getts will NOT give him a "deal he can't walk away from".  The days of over spending for players is over.

 

Not to mention that Woodson would be an OK stop gap...not someone worth breaking the bank for.

  • Pie 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




L-TownCat    11,876

 Getts will NOT give him a "deal he can't walk away from".  The days of over spending for players is over.

 

Not to mention that Woodson would be an OK stop gap...not someone worth breaking the bank for.

 

 

I never suggested break the bank.  I'm trying to imply that getts puts an offer on the table and either A: he signs it or B: he never walks again.

 

Hence a deal he can't walk away from.

  • Pie 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PhillyB    40,367

i'd love to have him but i don't want to become so enthralled with having cap space that we spend it on a regrettable decision.

 

i think regardless of what happens on this front we're going to need to find another guy that can contend to start at safety before training camp.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MadHatter    9,501

I never suggested break the bank.  I'm trying to imply that getts puts an offer on the table and either A: he signs it or B: he never walks again.

 

Hence a deal he can't walk away from.

 

 

My bad...I thought you meant to give him a deal that he could not refuse (as in we were willing to pay much more than any other team to ensure we got him).

  • Pie 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Catweisers    113

But if we had an inside rush would that play wouldn't have been in the hands of secondary any way.  That is why our draft made secondary better.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
XClown1986    1,370

But if we had an inside rush would that play wouldn't have been in the hands of secondary any way.  That is why our draft made secondary better.

 

 

 

 

............................what?

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




SauceBoss    356

Norman was beaten by almost 10 yards on that play.

 

He was the main reason....Nak just could not get there over the top.

 

hope you all are prepared for that this year

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
iamhubby1    2,895

hope you all are prepared for that this year

Ouch.

Take one play and define a players career. Well... that's stats for ya.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
iamhubby1    2,895

We do not need Woodson's leadership or mentoring skills. We have plenty of leaders and coaches we already count on. Plus, who's to say he even provides any of that? He is from GB after all. They aren't know for sharing.

 

Maybe his playmaking ability could come in handy. But, I am of the mind that we need to let our kids, who have done well, show us what they have. If they succeed we are going to be a tough out. UNLESS there is a way to teach ball hawking, I don't want him.

 

So I guess I am in the we don't need his old, GB smellin, nasty azz here anywho. Now if we were in SB mode, then maybe I pick this foul odorous poor example of a human up. jk I hate GB, so I hate Woodson.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tiger7_88    13,528

I realize people love to hate Nakamura and make excuses for Norman but Norman got embarrassed on that play. Nakamura was at least there to make a reasonable play on the ball. Roddy White is simply much better than either of them.

 

Dude, Nakamura plays safety.

 

SAFETY.

 

Do you understand the etymology of that word from a football point of view?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SauceBoss    356

Ouch.

Take one play and define a players career. Well... that's stats for ya.

Two words. Butt. Fumble. Good day sir.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jarhead    1,031

The bottom line is that play exposed two players at 2 positions.Have we addressed those positions in FA ? Somewhat

I do not buy by drafting 2 DTs that we have fixed our secondary garbage though.I am not advocating we break the bank but it sounds like the only offers Woodson has received is the league minimum.There are two other safetys on the market and by Naka being on the team tells me we need one of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×