Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Still makes me laugh...


  • Please log in to reply
35 replies to this topic

#1 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 38,940 posts
  • LocationSC

Posted 21 May 2013 - 11:24 AM

The memory of hearing the words "With the 13th pick, the New York Jets select...Sheldon Richardson" :blink: :lol:

No lie. I really did 'laugh out loud', and I'm still laughing.

If ESPN ever does another video of Jets draft blunders, I hope that clip deserves to be on it.

#2 TheRumGone

TheRumGone

    mountain man

  • ALL-PRO
  • 8,965 posts
  • LocationAsheville, NC

Posted 21 May 2013 - 11:27 AM

It was obviously great for us...

 

But to say it was a Jets blunder is kind of ridiculous. I think Richardson is gonna be a great player.



#3 SooSlow84

SooSlow84

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,247 posts
  • LocationYour mother's basement

Posted 21 May 2013 - 11:28 AM

Sheldon could turn out to be a really good football player and fill the role needed by the jets better than star would. They're two different players with two different skill sets.

Star was definitely the best pick for us, but its also possible Sheldon was the best pick for them.

#4 nosuchthingasapanther

nosuchthingasapanther

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,352 posts

Posted 21 May 2013 - 11:29 AM

richardson was a great pick for the jets.

#5 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 38,940 posts
  • LocationSC

Posted 21 May 2013 - 11:32 AM

I don't honestly care whether Richardson turns out good for the Jets. Granted, he might.

I care a lot that they didn't take Lotulelei :)

#6 Peppers90 NC

Peppers90 NC

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,561 posts

Posted 21 May 2013 - 11:36 AM

i didnt expect them to pick Star, but I sure as hell didnt expect them to get Richardson.  I was thinking Jarvis Jones or Eifert



#7 Gabeking

Gabeking

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,356 posts

Posted 21 May 2013 - 11:39 AM

r yU kiiddDieng Mme wweE wuuUuR FfFffrrooowIn XEPlaTiVes!!1!1!123!! - Charles Davis

#8 jtnc

jtnc

    Resident Asshole

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,419 posts

Posted 21 May 2013 - 11:39 AM

The fact Sheldon Richardson wasn't on our radar tells you the scouting department had some concerns about him.

#9 TheRumGone

TheRumGone

    mountain man

  • ALL-PRO
  • 8,965 posts
  • LocationAsheville, NC

Posted 21 May 2013 - 11:41 AM

Richardson wasn't liked around here because he wasn't that great against the run, which was something we needed badly. Which is why Star is a fuging Godsend. But Richardson has a lot of talent, great motor, good kid, ect. I think it was a great pick for the Jets. Play him outside in their 3-4. He can definitely improve on the run, but he's a great player.



#10 Sloth

Sloth

    idk

  • ALL-PRO
  • 2,700 posts

Posted 21 May 2013 - 11:44 AM

2vio6d0.png



#11 Tarheels23

Tarheels23

    Keep Pounding

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,701 posts

Posted 21 May 2013 - 11:44 AM

Richardson plays the same position as Wilkerson, and Coples, who by the way, is now moving to OLB.

It's a dumb pick, not because of Richardson, but because it wasn't a position of need.

Either way I'm happy as Fuq.

#12 TheRumGone

TheRumGone

    mountain man

  • ALL-PRO
  • 8,965 posts
  • LocationAsheville, NC

Posted 21 May 2013 - 11:46 AM

Richardson plays the same position as Wilkerson, and Coples, who by the way, is now moving to OLB.

It's a dumb pick, not because of Richardson, but because it wasn't a position of need.

Either way I'm happy as Fuq.

 

Coples 6-6 285

 

Richardson 6-3 300

 

completely different types of players. Coples can play OLB. Richardson? no fuging way.



#13 Tarheels23

Tarheels23

    Keep Pounding

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,701 posts

Posted 21 May 2013 - 11:50 AM

Coples 6-6 285

Richardson 6-3 300

completely different types of players. Coples can play OLB. Richardson? no fuging way.



In a 3-4 defense, Richardson, Wilkerson, and Coples are all DEs. Coples will not have success as a 3-4 OLB.

#14 Leeroy Jenkins PhD

Leeroy Jenkins PhD

    HCIC

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,969 posts
  • LocationHouston Texas

Posted 21 May 2013 - 11:50 AM

Not to change the subject but fug Panthers media player.  A multi-million dollar industry and they have a media player of a middle school lacrosse team



#15 TheRumGone

TheRumGone

    mountain man

  • ALL-PRO
  • 8,965 posts
  • LocationAsheville, NC

Posted 21 May 2013 - 11:51 AM

In a 3-4 defense, Richardson, Wilkerson, and Coples are all DEs. Coples will not have success as a 3-4 OLB.

 

I hope not against us. But i disagree.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com