The main point I was trying to make is the fact that it was an objective post. He wasn't one extreme or the other so to speak. Wasn't saying "Oh Shula sucks no matter what, fire his @ss!" and also wasn't saying "Lighten up on Shula, he is actually really good!"
Said Shula was good at play design (props where necessary) and bad at play calling (constructive criticism). So IMO, basically just laid the facts out and told it like it was, which is why I said I agree with his assessment.