Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Do The Post-Cut Positional Numbers Mean a Shift in Philosophy?


  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

#11 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,123
  • Reputation: 5,285
Moderators

Posted 31 August 2013 - 11:37 PM

My fear is we are going to see playcalls from the 60s. Then again after Smith and LaFell we just had some dudes like most years.


Cam is still the QB....and Shula knows what he can do. He got Chud a HC gig. He is that awesome. Shula won't sit on that

#12 Lumps

Lumps

    Jase is butthurt

  • Joined: 20-October 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,779
  • Reputation: 907
  • LocationSouth Charlotte
HUDDLER

Posted 31 August 2013 - 11:40 PM

I agree but big difference between coaching Cam vs. the entire offense. Cam is not our offense he is our QB, regardless of his first two years, he'll have to play less a role in some areas for us to actually win some games.

 

I hope Shula can do it, just have to wait and see.



#13 Proudiddy

Proudiddy

    The Thread Killer (Since 2004)

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 17,031
  • Reputation: 5,233
Moderators

Posted 01 September 2013 - 12:19 AM

4 RBs

Williams
Tolbert
Barner
Smith

Stewart would be the 4th if off PUP and Smith gone

My point being Stewart factored into the numbers whether he was active or not, so by keeping Smith, we technically kept 5.

#14 carpanfan96

carpanfan96

    play hard, hit harder

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • posts: 11,995
  • Reputation: 962
  • LocationLexington, NC
SUPPORTER

Posted 01 September 2013 - 12:23 AM

Brockel mainly plays FB on GL blocking plays and such, so he basically counts as a FB since that's where they list him now position wise. 



#15 jarhead

jarhead

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,632
  • Reputation: 995
  • Locationnear Charlotte
HUDDLER

Posted 01 September 2013 - 05:05 AM

This party is not over ...we will see some moves soon I would imagine.I think we will see a couple of things...The first is back filling for special team value and the 2nd is upgrading our depth . I could see him bringing in maybe 1 or 2 starters at the most if the need and value are there.



#16 Jackofalltrades

Jackofalltrades

    OWN the Line of Scrimmage

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • posts: 18,653
  • Reputation: 6,636
  • LocationNC
SUPPORTER

Posted 01 September 2013 - 05:36 AM

I think they're keeping some of the guys in positions of strength for potential trade leverage.

 

Several teams are RB hungry, same with CB's.

 

You could also point to a shift in personnel best suited for ST play?



#17 mbarbour21

mbarbour21

    HUDDLER

  • Joined: 16-May 13
  • posts: 1,281
  • Reputation: 489
SUPPORTER

Posted 01 September 2013 - 06:55 AM

We kept a lot of people because of versatility. A. Smith, Jones, White, Senn, Brockel, Addison, Naka, D.J. Moore, and Blackburn. We drafted that way late as well. Klein and Barner.

#18 KSpan

KSpan

    Bow-chicka-wow-wow!

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 3,472
  • Reputation: 1,760
  • LocationKansas City
SUPPORTER

Posted 01 September 2013 - 07:17 AM

Agree with previous posters that the bottom of the depth chart is generally for special teams, so at that point a 4th HB, 6th WR, 6th CB etc. essentially play the same in-game positions if they are active.

#19 nosuchthingasapanther

nosuchthingasapanther

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 5,770
  • Reputation: 2,308
SUPPORTER

Posted 01 September 2013 - 08:21 AM

My point being Stewart factored into the numbers whether he was active or not, so by keeping Smith, we technically kept 5.

 

smith is there to keep stewart's seat warm.



#20 Frank Hollywood

Frank Hollywood

    HUDDLER

  • Joined: 13-April 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,511
  • Reputation: 612
  • LocationYour mother's basement
HUDDLER

Posted 01 September 2013 - 09:40 AM

I am sooooo drunk. You're going to have to make this a, "Choose A or B" for me to give you anything. Before you do, I choose B.



Now, back to being serious, we won't start the season with 5 WR's. This is where the process begins, not ends. Gettleman is no idiot. He is scanning all there is to scan like Sauron in the Lord of the Rings.


Now, back to drinking and the Gettis thread....

I actually think we start the season with five receivers.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users