Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Sammy Watkins

58 posts in this topic

Posted

The most talented player in the draft. He needs to be a Panther somehow. The effect he would have on our offense would be priceless. With Watkins I think despite our offensive line woes as of now, we would still undoubtedly be a top 10 offense. Top 5 even a possibility.

 

The amount of cap hit we are taking from Hardy ft is a ton. We were the second best defense. Take out Hardy and add Watkins to our offense and our D doesn't need to be AS good and our D is still going to be beastly cause of TD, Star, CJ, Kuechly. And I only named the guys we know for a fact can ball. I didn't name Short who could also be an All Pro DT or our slew of potential starting DE's with Addison, Horton, Alexander

 

We don't need to spend out the asshole for one great player on a great D we have plenty of great players on D. I think Gettleman has something up his sleeve and if a long term deal cant be agreed upon Hardy is traded.

 

Bottom line, Watkins makes our offense great. You want a sure fire #1? You get it in Watkins. He coulda fuged poo up in this years Pro Bowl ffs. Him and Cam would make a combo so prolific, unlike any combo ever in the NFL. HOF'er to HOF'er building their HOF resumes together.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Yeah but do you know why kids love the cinnamony taste of cinnamon toast crunch?

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

benn.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The most talented player in the draft. He needs to be a Panther somehow. The effect he would have on our offense would be priceless. With Watkins I think despite our offensive line woes as of now, we would still undoubtedly be a top 10 offense. Top 5 even a possibility.

 

The amount of cap hit we are taking from Hardy ft is a ton. We were the second best defense. Take out Hardy and add Watkins to our offense and our D doesn't need to be AS good and our D is still going to be beastly cause of TD, Star, CJ, Kuechly. And I only named the guys we know for a fact can ball. I didn't name Short who could also be an All Pro DT or our slew of potential starting DE's with Addison, Horton, Alexander

 

We don't need to spend out the asshole for one great player on a great D we have plenty of great players on D. I think Gettleman has something up his sleeve and if a long term deal cant be agreed upon Hardy is traded.

 

Bottom line, Watkins makes our offense great. You want a sure fire #1? You get it in Watkins. He coulda fuged poo up in this years Pro Bowl ffs. Him and Cam would make a combo so prolific, unlike any combo ever in the NFL. HOF'er to HOF'er building their HOF resumes together.

 

So, you'd rather spend out the asshole for one draft prospect?  At least in Hardy we get a proven performer in our defense.  I'd love to Watkins, no doubt about it.  However, it would cost us a TON to move up to get him.  We'd literally be mortgaging the future of the franchise on him.  The best case for not doing that is in our own division - the Atlanta Falcons.  They moved up for a great WR prospect and Julio Jones turned out to be a great WR.  However, look at what they gave up to get him and then look at all the holes they have on their roster.  The two are definitely linked.  I don't want to see us do that.  We have too many holes on our own roster to give up a ton for a prospect.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I mean mostly of what we'd be giving up to get Watkins is Hardy imo - can we afford to lose an elite DE? we aren't the Falcons or a team not deep at DE so. Yeah. Its not like were gettin chump change in return for Hardy. We are getting a guy who's going to ball like a seasoned vet from week 1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Rather have Mike Evans

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

You are delusional...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I don't even know what to say.

And who in their right mind would rather have Evans?

This thread is full of fail.

8 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Give me a Boldin type of receiver and I'll be at peace. We don't need a Megatron 2.0.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Give me a Boldin type of receiver and I'll be at peace. We don't need a Megatron 2.0.

 

You act like Boldin is chopped liver.  He's a 3x Pro Bowler who has over 10k career receiving yards.  He also got to 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 receptions in fewer games than anyone in NFL history.  Every team would gladly take a Boldin type of receiver.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

You act like Boldin is chopped liver. He's a 3x Pro Bowler who has over 10k career receiving yards. He also got to 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 receptions in fewer games than anyone in NFL history. Every team would gladly take a Boldin type of receiver.

I'm not acting like he's chopped liver. I'm just saying I want a physical receiver who can make the tough/clutch catches.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Rather have Mike Evans

 

Lolz

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites