Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Clinton v. Bush possibility

28 posts in this topic

Posted

This would be the ultimate puppet scenario

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Jesse Ventura 2016!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

You telling me... Out of 300,000,000 qualified US citizens, we got the same family running for president for almost 30 years?

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

You telling me... Out of 300,000,000 qualified US citizens, we got the same family running for president for almost 30 years?

So much for Democracy?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

You telling me... Out of 300,000,000 qualified US citizens, we got the same family running for president for almost 30 years?

This question might only be asked on the Daily show. Forget the news outlets asking this.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I can't tell you enough how happy it would make me if both of these families rode off into the sunset.

 

We need some freshness in DC, but instead dumb voters will continue to elect the exact same people over and over again.

 

In the past 35 years, we have had 2 good Presidents, that's pretty sad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Seriously this will probably be my first time voting third party on the presidential ticket

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I thought only oligarchy governments had few families but America is facing the possible scenario, even though like Arsen said, 300 million people. Really baa sheeple! Ra ra ra go Hiltlery or Bush pt 3!

Even the GOP is scared of Rand Paul that the establishment is starting a Jeb rally and Hiltlery is already crowned by the left. Check out how states are closing doors on third parties but most of the time third parties are pawns for the two parties. Go ahead, pick the losing proposition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I can't tell you enough how happy it would make me if both of these families rode off into the sunset.

 

We need some freshness in DC, but instead dumb voters will continue to elect the exact same people over and over again.

 

In the past 35 years, we have had 2 good Presidents, that's pretty sad.

 

Which two?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I can't tell you enough how happy it would make me if both of these families rode off into the sunset.

 

We need some freshness in DC, but instead dumb voters will continue to elect the exact same people over and over again.

 

In the past 35 years, we have had 2 good Presidents, that's pretty sad.

 

We have?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I like Jeb. I would vote for him over Hillary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

http://capitolcityproject.com/hillary-struggles-list-accomplishments-secretary-state-tenure/

 

 

“When you look at your time as Secretary of State, what are you most proud of? And what do you feel was unfinished, and maybe have another crack at one day?” the moderator asks.

 

 

Look, I really see my role as Secretary, in fact leadership in general in a democracy, as a relay race. When you run the best race you can run, you hand off the baton. Some of what hasn’t been finished may go on to be finished, so when President Obama asked me to be Secretary of State I agreed,” Clinton responded.
 
She continued, “We had the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, we had two wars. We had continuing threats from all kinds of corners around the world that we had to deal with. So it was a perilous time frankly. What he said to me was, ‘Look, I have to be dealing with the economic crisis, I want you to go out and represent us around the world.’ And it was a good division of labor because we needed to make it clear to the rest of the world, that we were going to get our house in order. We were going to stimulate, and grow, and get back to positive growth and work with our friends and partners.”
 
“So I think we did that. I’m very proud of the stabilization and the really solid leadership that the administration provided that I think now, leads us to be able to deal with problems like Ukraine because we’re not so worried about a massive collapse in Europe and China — trying to figure out to do with all their bond holdings and all the problems we were obsessed with. I think we really restored American leadership in the best sense. That, once again — people began to rely on us as setting the values, setting the standards. I just don’t want to lose that because we have a dysfunctional political situation in Washington. Then of course, a lot of particulars, but I am finishing my book so you’ll be able to read all about it.”

 

 

Wow. Read my book lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites