Jump to content



Member Since 30 Jan 2012
Last Active Feb 03 2015 07:44 PM

#2781355 We didn't do Cam any favors, and if this is it we're gonna have some...

Posted by uscgamecocks on 11 May 2014 - 07:31 PM

Richardson and Hurst weren't even drafted. Turner was a 3rd round talent that went before our pick in the third round. Same with Moses. Like many, I was hoping a left tackle would fall to us but it just didn't happen. No one we drafted was going to start over Bell or Chandler at LT and most of those guys would have made bad RTs.

The pick I disagreed with was not drafting Fleming in the fourth. We need a RT and he seemed to fit the bill. But we worked him out so it's not like we didn't know about him. Our staff must have felt he wasn't a very good prospect - most Stanford OTs haven't lived up to their billing in recent years so who knows.

And I'm not sure why everyone is ignoring Tavares king. He was a fifth round pick we stole from the Broncos and might as well be viewed as being part of this draft class. Maybe Gettleman didn't feel some of those late round receivers were more deserving of a spot on our roster than King. After all, they've worked with him (and McNutt) and have seen them in practice - I take the front office not drafting a second receiver as a sign of confidence in those guys.

Lastly, drafting Ealy in the second a year ahead of when he will start (after CJ or Kraken are cut) will allow us to use that 2015 first rounder on another elite WR or LT for Cam.

#2773866 Official Day 2 Draft Thread

Posted by uscgamecocks on 09 May 2014 - 08:06 PM

Take Ealy colts.

#2772179 Who do YOU want tonight?

Posted by uscgamecocks on 09 May 2014 - 01:23 PM

Best OT/WR available. If Latimer/Robinson/Lee/Matthews are there in the second I would love the pick. Same with CK/Moses/Bitonio/Turner.

Dream scenario for me would be:

2nd: Latimer
3rd: Turner
4th: Hurst

Straight BPA for the rest of the draft.

Unlikely, but that would be awesome. Then we hit DBs hard next year.

#2762870 The Fearsome 4s

Posted by uscgamecocks on 06 May 2014 - 07:05 AM

That's a miserable list.

I'm down with trading the pick away.

#2758468 Let's see which armchair GM's admit being wrong.

Posted by uscgamecocks on 01 May 2014 - 06:46 PM

Disagreed with Keuchly vehemently. Wasn't a huge fan of the Cam pick but I understood it.

I liked Jarrett and Clausen. Was I ever wrong.

#2752679 CBS Mock-Ebron@28

Posted by uscgamecocks on 26 April 2014 - 04:40 PM

Ebron at 28 is a dream scenario. He's a pass catcher and that's what we need. Split him out wide if you have to, he and Olsen can play together. And he's certainly going to be a better blocker than Cooks/OBJ/Lee. Grab a WR in the 2nd round and Hurst in the 3rd. I don't even like UNC but that would be a killer draft.

#2747628 30 players attending the draft

Posted by uscgamecocks on 22 April 2014 - 08:51 PM

7 receivers invited. At least one of them will be on the board for our pick.

I think it's safe to say that our interest in Latimer probably isn't a smokescreen.

#2742892 SB Nation Bloggers Draft

Posted by uscgamecocks on 18 April 2014 - 08:18 AM

Okay, if the fuger (Lee) sucks and we take him what will you say then? That's my point, there is a higher probability of him sucking then working out. If hes good, that's fine. I'll admit I'm wrong and eat my crow. I have zero problems admitting I'm wrong, unlike a lot of people on here. But there are better receivers that will be on the board at pick 28, and lets be honest, Lee could fall to the 2nd round in my opinion. We have a huge need on the OL to address too.

I think Lee has the same probability of busting as any other prospect. Frankly, any talented WR we draft early is walking into a great situation and should be successful to some degree. Cam as a QB, plenty of opportunity, and DG will absolutely make the OL a strength over the next one to two years. It's in his DNA.

We clearly have different rankings on WR prospects which is to be expected. Personally, I rank them as follows: Watkins, Evans, OBJ and Lee (tied), Cooks and Matthews (tied). Those are the only guys I would draft in the first round. But it's all subjective and I'm certainly no scout or NFL coach. Just a guy with an opinion.

And I'm with you on needing O line help. I think OT is our most likely pick in the first. I worry that we won't get a potential #1 receiver at pick 60 but the same can be said for tackle. I'm hoping we can somehow get two picks in the top 45 and address LT and WR. Maybe Moses and Matthews - that would be ideal.
  • C47 PIE'd this

#2742871 SB Nation Bloggers Draft

Posted by uscgamecocks on 18 April 2014 - 07:38 AM

I'm not even close to being a Southern Cal fan.

The idea that being a SoCal receiver is a reason not to draft Lee just strikes me as lazy analysis. There are holes to poke in Lee's game for sure but the colors he wore should be irrelevant at this point.

The Trojan WRs that busted in the NFL all came from Pete Carroll's teams. Those teams were stacked with 5* recruits at every position and cake walked through college football for a decade. Then the playing field was leveled - after Carroll left, the sanctions, etc. The PAC caught up to the Trojans under Kiffin and no longer do their players enjoy an immense talent advantage at nearly every position. Those Trojan offensive lines made their QBs and WRs look much better than they were.

Lee made his name under a different coach and staff and should be evaluated in that context. Mike Williams has literally nothing to do with Lee. Robert Woods is a much more valid precedent and he did pretty well in his rookie season.

Another example, in my opinion, is the Alabama RB position. Alabama teams have enjoyed a significant advantage on the O-Line for the past five years in nearly every game they have played. As such, their RBs regularly get 3-5 yards downfield before having to think about a defensive player. Those RBs have underperformed in the NFL where the playing field is more level, the holes are smaller, and the linebackers are bigger and faster. For that reason I would be wary of drafting a Bama RB - though Lacy did look pretty good last year. But I don't think that should be held against a Bama RB ten years from now - after Saban has moved on and Bama's recruiting has fallen off.
  • C47 PIE'd this

#2742660 Ruff's Pre-Draft Mock Draft

Posted by uscgamecocks on 17 April 2014 - 08:43 PM

To walk away without a great WR prospect in the deepest WR drafts in recent memory - with our legion of middling one and two-year rentals - would be disappointing.

I like the top three guys in your draft but I think we've got to get a WR in one of those slots.

#2728775 Prospect Meetings By Position *Allen Robinson*

Posted by uscgamecocks on 06 April 2014 - 11:58 AM

I think from that list a double dip is likely to happen.

Yeah my guess would be WR / OT / WR in the first three rounds is the plan going in. But most draft plans are busted by the tenth pick, so who knows.

#2728691 Marqise Lee Visiting Panthers

Posted by uscgamecocks on 06 April 2014 - 07:32 AM

Yes it's 2013 only. If we only looked at 2012 some of you idiots would be calling Watkins a bust....

And if you only looked at Sammy's stats vs. South Carolina he'd be a third day prospect. But sample size and context matter, so Sammy is deservedly a top 5 pick. I hope other NFL teams overlook Lee in the draft so that we can grab him at 28.
  • C47 PIE'd this

#2727398 McNabb weighs in on our lack of a threat at WR (via D. Newton)

Posted by uscgamecocks on 04 April 2014 - 06:21 PM

If Gettleman doesn't think we need a number 1 receiver then why are we working out all of the first round receivers?

Based on our workouts thus far, I'd say it's more likely than not we end up going WR early in this draft. If we spend a 1st on a guy he's going to be the #1 by midseason.

#2720973 Updated fanspeak simulator

Posted by uscgamecocks on 29 March 2014 - 04:32 PM

I used fan speak and on mine Marquise Lee stayed on the board until 58...

Sent from my SGH-M919 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Ha - well clearly the simulator and I have different opinions on Lee.

Safe to say I'd be ecstatic with Lee in the second. I think he played injured last year and still put up very good numbers. Reminds me of Keenan Allen in that regard. I'd take him all day at the end of the first round.

#2720482 Updated fanspeak simulator

Posted by uscgamecocks on 28 March 2014 - 09:38 PM


Drafted using walter big board. The more I look at it the more I think we end up waiting on a WR and going OL in the first. This WR class is ridiculously deep.