nice list nagi, being the huddle benjamin nut-hugger WHERE THE F%&(w(*w(K IS HE??!?!?!!!111?1
yep factoring in the pathers needs causes change, but i still value overall talent. I think the top four corners could play in any scheme, which are they better suited for?( well thats the question) seattle and pats dont care about ranking or experts opinion, how will they fit in the given role is all they care about.
lol Thanks, I'm personally not a big Benjamin fan. To each their own.
I don't care what team you're on, your FO is interested in Clowney and Watkins. It doesn't matter if they didn't talk him at the combine, or whatever, they are interested. You just don't see talent like that every day.
Something like that. This is just a rating of talent + scheme fit, I don't know how much positional needs will affect these rankings. A real team would also take some of these players off the board completely. Take Dennard just for example, is he a complete corner, or is he specialist, press guy? Would he look average in our zone-blitz scheme? Who knows.