Jump to content


DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

Member Since 25 Nov 2008
Offline Last Active Today, 10:41 AM
*****

#1349732 Jerry Richardson to Cam: No Tattoos, No Piercings

Posted by DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA) on 25 August 2011 - 10:18 AM

Colin Cowherd is generally an idiot but he was on point today talking about it.

You don't require the same things from Reggie Wayne you do Peyton Manning if you are Indy. Peyton is held to a higher standard. Cowherd has bagged on Romo for years.....backward hats belong to the TEs....not the face of the Dallas franchise.


#1348097 Should the XP Rule Be Changed? (Note: Not Cam Newton Related)

Posted by DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA) on 24 August 2011 - 09:17 AM

some things don't need to be changed. XP is fine.

Every year a team not converting an XP is the difference maker in a game.


#1348028 Jerry Richardson to Cam: No Tattoos, No Piercings

Posted by DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA) on 24 August 2011 - 08:35 AM

Michael Vick had cornrows and was the highest paid player in the NFL and had a HUGE contract from Nike. Larry Fitzgerald has dreads and just got QB money from AZ, and has endorsements with Nike as well. Truth be told, nothing wrong with clean cut and Cam is a guy that isnt into all that other stuff, but Charlotte is one of the few markets that is anal about it. This wouldnt even be a story or care in NY, ATL, LA. I dont think they're tripping off "image" like this in those markets. I think letting a statement get out like this is a slippery slope because they're players on the payroll who fit that bill and there are fans who have "tatts and piercings" who support the Panthers.


people are taking this all too literal.

There is a difference between Larry Fitz and say a Steve Smith/Jeremy Shockey. JR would be fine if Cam presented himself like Fitz. JR was really paying Cam a compliment in his own way......NOT so much as telling Cam what he can't do. Jez.....


#1345914 Greg Hardy will start

Posted by DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA) on 23 August 2011 - 08:08 AM

They have similar builds and athletic ability. But obviously Peppers is a little more gifted. Doesn't mean he can't be as good or a great player because Hardy can bring a mean streak where Peppers would rather go and pick the dandelions and 4 leaf clovers out of the grass.


Hardy isn't on the Peppers level in terms of athletic ability.....Peppers is off the charts.


#1345563 The Herd on Cam Newton today

Posted by DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA) on 22 August 2011 - 08:50 PM

Jimmy wasn't the number 1 overall pick either ;) ...the higher the pick the higher the scrutiny.


correct Jimmy wasn't.

But Cam missed roughly 1500 reps thanks to the offseason per Rivera. And he is already on par w/ Clausen overall........who has 10 starts, 13 NFL games, and was a "polished" qb coming out of school.

so it just seems like most hot air for those trying to find ways to knock him through 2 preseason games where he hasn't turned the ball over and completed more first downs than Jimmy despite less drive attempts.


#1344472 Newton starter vs Bengals, Week 1 starter TBD

Posted by DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA) on 22 August 2011 - 08:29 AM

I agree with you that I believe this team is going to take its lumps with either Clausen or Cam as the starter.

And, I am always worried about throwing a young guy out there too soon and destroying his psyche.

However, I do believe that Cam is mentally strong enough to handle it....at least from what I have seen. If they do start him and we go down this path, I hope and pray we don't have another Carr or Harrington situation.

Starting him early is a risky proposition....and I hope that Rivera and staff make the correct one.


the bust/success right is about the same if you start or sit a top drafted rookie QB.

Mentally, I don't think you can put Cam in a hole he can't work his way out of.....so I am not worried about that. Might was well start him.

Cam doesn't look ready I agree....but a 2nd year Clausen looks no more ready. Might was well roll w/ the one who has the highest ceiling.....and the fact that isn't close makes it an easy decision.


#1343688 Newton starter vs Bengals, Week 1 starter TBD

Posted by DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA) on 21 August 2011 - 06:09 PM

There were 7 snaps in the first quarter that were on 1st or 2nd down and they ran on 3 of them (I think it was 7). They ran the ball. However, by the time we got the ball a third time, I think they wanted to see what Cam could do with his arm because running wasn't generating much in the way of yardage whereas Cam was actually getting positive yards with his arm. Plus, they probably wanted to see how he'd respond when he was down. They were loading the box and daring Cam to beat them, and he couldn't.

Some thing a lot of fans will have to realize is that Chuds was known for not running the ball very much with the Browns, and it's not like they had a bad back there.


they ran on 27% of the running downs. They weren't running the ball. And really it would have been a waste of time to run Williams when you have Cam in getting reps in preseason game 2.

it would also help if someone other than TEs could get open consistantly......they aren't. Not much you can do when they dare you to run and your WRs consistantly can't get seperation. Cam ain't scared to fling it around. Granted he might miss some but there hasn't been much for him to take chances with.


#1339242 If TRD charted Big Ben's game last night the same way he did Cam

Posted by DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA) on 19 August 2011 - 03:44 PM

but nobody is pulling against the panthers. nobody is hoping for Cam to do poorly either.


if you pull for opponents to outperform Carolina players......then you don't understand what being a true fan of a team is about.


#1336848 Stewart, Goodson, Gamble and Barnridge all questionable for Miami game

Posted by DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA) on 18 August 2011 - 12:39 PM

Wouldnt you guys rather them sit out and be healthy when the real games start? Who cares if Marshall destroys the other corners (imo he'd destroy gamble too, but thats another argument) ? It's a preseason game. Meaningless.


b/c if he is destroying our weak CBs that shouldn't be on the field w/ 1s....it is tough for the D to get in a good practice or for us to get a good feel of what we really can do.

and yes, with good QB play Marshall would destroy Gamble.....but not sure you will have that.


#1335237 Shockey's camp comments on the U scandal

Posted by DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA) on 17 August 2011 - 03:47 PM

Ooops. Open mouth and insert foot Shockey (though he's right).


yep, they do it at every big name program in the country.....

yet fans of teams not caught act appalled....


#1334305 NFLN made interesting point on Cam

Posted by DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA) on 17 August 2011 - 08:35 AM

Yep. Some here makie some big assumptions, like Cam can pass accurately and running quarterbacks succeed in the NFL. The only reason Mike Vick is flourishing right now is because he taught himself how to throw a football in prison. Cam needs to be feared as a passer under pressure and that is something that has to be earned in the regular season.


only reasoning Vick is good now is b/c Reid > Mora Jr.....by a large margin. Totally different schemes, weapons.....and he is being used different. Vick himself isn't drastically different.


#1334259 NFLN made interesting point on Cam

Posted by DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA) on 17 August 2011 - 08:12 AM

Was watching last night and they made an interesting comment in regards to Cam Newton. In addition to the belief he should be the week 1 starter they gave this reasoning....

The NFL today is about spreading teams out....and if Carolina is willing to use 4 WR sets (could include Olsen) then it would be near impossible for a defense to defend Carolina without huge mismatches on the field. Most teams would look to defend those looks by going to nickel and dime w/ added DBs on the field........but if you do that then there is no way they can handle Cam taking off simply b/c they aren't going to win the battle.

Thoughts?


#1332715 My observations of Cam Newton's game

Posted by DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA) on 16 August 2011 - 01:02 PM

I have a lot of posts. That really doesn't mean jack.


good point. you have too many. too many or too few basically doesn't really mean anything.

I on the other hand have just the right amount to support the fact that posts I make will be 100% correct.


#1332607 Hey guys no Matter what I have decided I want to be Perma-Banned

Posted by DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA) on 16 August 2011 - 12:23 PM

That's false, I've said plenty of times Cam is the best chance for this team and needs to start NOW.

Maybe you should spend more time reading my actual posts and not reading what you want them to say.


I do read them.

conversations go lke this

poster - A - Cam looked surprisingly well given the circumstances....I think he could do well for us soon. He looked really good.

you - he played like garbage - throws off his back foot, should be 10 times better b/c you guys said he was perfect coming out of college.

10940 post later

you - I think Cam is better than Clausen so I am not hating.


#1330695 The reality of Clausen's good night

Posted by DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA) on 15 August 2011 - 03:38 PM

lol I've never seen CRA have a good thing to say about Clausen... no surprise here...


I defended Jimmy when people bashed him as arrogant, overconfident, and kind of a dick. I think he is good kid and I think the guys in the lockerroom like him.....and that means something in this league. I think he is a hard worker, smart, and has potential to be a good QB in the right system.

he is going to be playing in his 2nd consective system that he simply doesn't fit in at this level.....and that happens to be for a team I support. He doesn't fit and is limited physically to start with......the results aren't going to be good. They haven't to date.....so few good things at this point will be said unless proven otherwise.

In my ideal world, Jimmy would start this season and Cam would sit. I don't think that is realitic though at all.....I am not pulling for his failure.....I just believe he has little chance of doing anything in offenses that play against what he does well and to what he doesn't do well (and there is no way around that overall).




Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com