I understand this is a feel good thread so excuse me for seeing a negative side.
We are the most talented team in the South, no doubt. So what does it say about our coaching that we couldn't put together a more impressive w/l record? To me, this is another indication that we are not a well coached team. Hopefully, we'll still dominate over the next few years in spite of our coaching deficiencies.
To argue how good of a coach chud is when shula and Wilks still have a pay check is beyond baffling. Basically chemistry and friendship trump results. In that way of thinking I suppose Deangelo will be back next year on the grounds of he's good for chemistry?
First of all, what's wrong with Wilks and what does this have to do with the OC position.
Second, you want to talk about results, you might want to take a look at how our points scored in 2012 compared with points scored in 2013/2014.
Chud wasn't popular, didn't help us get wins, and didn't score enough points. So what made him a good OC?