there is the possibility those games were anomalies. There is also the possibility his first two this season were. However, his performance on Sunday tends to indicate that, while the games last season may not be anomalies, it's possible that now that there is more film on him, something is giving him away.
It wasn't just one bad game, man. Take away that first game, and what does he have?
1 TD, 3 ints... =\
A bad first few games I would agree with. Could that mean he'd have a good season after we put him back in? It's possible. However, *something* made the coaches doubt his performance last year enough to only get him for a year - and I don't think that is because Fox was leaving, but because someone didn't trust him.
Seriously? Havent we gone over this? It doesnt matter who our QB is. We could have Peyton under the snap and he wouldnt do poo the way our o-line plays. Even if he scrambles out and makes a perfect pass just like our reciever's have done this year they would drop the ball. Matt Moore was out for a reason. 1. He played like total poo. (Not saying Clausen isnt) 2. We drafted Clausen for a reason. He is our "future franchise QB"
About MM and JC stats, if you put Jimmy under the snap in 2009 whose to say he wouldnt of done just as good as MM. It's a totally differnent team.