DaveThePanther2008

If you're going to bring up the Burns trade you have to include the players we were able to sign with the money we saved by trading Burns. We got three positions of need with the money we saved by trading him.

Actually pretty shocked we go decent grades for these picks because there were other high profile names still on the board and would have thought we'd get lambasted for our picks.

Powerful leg but the clip alluded to him missing a chip shot. They might have a new kicker but let's see how he does in preseason.

Agree with @Growl Most of you bang your heads over these picks and some might be head scratchers but building a culture with players that fit Morgan and Canales should be top priority. Many of our latter round picks should tell you something. Words like Baller, Ultra-competitive, beast, high motor all fit these guys. Hopefully, in a couple of years when this draft class is truly analysied we see these guys get drafted higher than where we got them. I know the career GMs in here won't understand.

Honestly, Rounds 1-4 we're just what the doctor ordered. Rounds 5-7 I thought there we're better players available at the position we drafted but I feel these players drafted have a certain disposition that Morgan is looking for. Plus getting a #2 next season really helps. It's a B+ for me. I can't wait to see them on the field. If you add everything this off-season FA, trades, the draft and UDFAs to the mix I think our off-season is an A+.

Coker will have a great mentor in Theilen. Theilen was an undrafted rookie as well. Each year I pick UDFA that makes the team or PS. Coker is my man in 2024. Outside of Smitty really liking him I love that he's a great route runner.

If you can get a good route runner in UFDA you go all in for him.

He did well at the Senior Bowl and is an ultra-competitor This is thee type of player you want in the 5th round. Fight and scrap. Sure there may have been other players we need but are they sound enough to fight tooth and nail. I feel this guy has it. The Dawg is in him

Well you just got two more right than Mel Kiper.

Not that Dallas is an expert on RBs but Jerry Jones really wanted Brooks. https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/cowboys-miss-on-jonathan-brooks-who-ranks-as-next-best-rb/ar-AA1nKjeX

I'm not going to post as if I know anything about this guy. What I can say from watching the videos this guy is a sure tackling LB. Some of his tackles are violent and about as sure as you can get that the offensive player is going down. The videos seem to portrait a DAWG. I believe Dan sees something special in him and look forward to see how he does his rookie campaign. I have read he's pretty good covering TE and RBs out of the backfield. Sounds like a perfect 3rd down player and once he's coached up to correct his flaws he'll Crack the lineup.

This is hilarious.

Based on your prediction I don't see us taking another WR. We need starters. If we take a WR at 39 he'll be, at best, 4th on the depth chart and possibly further down if Canales gets Mingo and/or TMJ to step up. Kneeland, I read has a huge upside. Cooper would allow us to walk away from Shaq next year. Wilson has Luke's endorsement. There are also a couple of CB that could help us. Can't predict but I'm betting we don't double down.

It obvious to me the only reason they made the trade is for the 5th year option.

Totally agree. I thought maybe we might get an offer for Nix but that went out the window.

Totally surprised. That drops one more first round picks to round 2.

Moving up would certainly cost us a first round pick next year. That would be foolish.

Glad to hear from you. Prayers for a speedy recovery and many more years of your incredible posts. Plus I miss the hog mollies pics in your posts.

First of all I said IF. Secondly, this would indicate to me it wasn't a one time thing. IF This was a one time thing I completely understand. Kids with money is tough not to endulge, hell kids without money love to party.

I don't think he's PJ Walker by no stretch of the imagination. However unless we significant progress he shouldn't have been the #1 overall pick either. Would you call him a franchise QB or a QB that just needs to manage the game plan? FYI, I'm pulling for him to prove me wrong but at this moment a solid game manager is the best we can hope for.

So basically Young takes over or he's a bust. He's not Cam Newton and isn't a franchise QB. Whether we like it or not Young is QB1 and he's a game manager, at best.

No offense but, I'll take Canales over you 100% of the time. Young isn't a franchise QB. He just needs to execute his high profile position. Manage the game plan and do your job.

If the guy is borderline alcoholic it won't help us much if he's in trouble all the time. That said, I would take a shot if he were there at 101.

As Dave Canales said last week. Young only needs to be 1/11th of the solution. Just do your job and don't try to be the hero. At this point he's our QB but I wouldn't say franchise QB.

Either way you look at it a high value 1st round pick is going to fall in this draft especially if all 6 QBs go. I'd weight the trade based off what the future 1st would bring. If we're trading with KC, Buffalo or any playoff caliber team I probably wouldn't make the trade because we'd only move up a spot or two and have to wait a year. However, if NYG or Seattle or any other team that might wind up in the upper portion of the draft I'm going to listen. More importantly the trade would have to be a win for us.