toldozer

No the right play would have been keeping cmc and Moore and trading burns. Instead we traded guys that we still had to eat large chunks of dead cap and did 0 with the return we got for them. Now shitterers assistant is in charge of the team. Taking it back even further the right play would have been starting will Grier instead of bringing in Bridgewater taking our lumps in year one of rhule and starting a rebuild instead of trying to get to 8-8. If ever there was a perfect year to tank it was 2020 with no fans in the stands and they would have taken very little backlash

I personally would replace the two unpaid tomorrow especially if they aren't communicating with you at all.

What a bone head. I know it's a personal matter but please tell me exactly what it is. I would have told him personal matter means its none of your fuging business asshole. Lewis was more gracious then I would have been

Yeah I think that was about a 6-9 month window on the immediate resale of teslas. Anyone that could put 10-15k in their pocket should have done it. When I was changing to a commission only job in 2021 my wife and I traded in cars that we bought tail end of 2019, lowered our monthly payments and loan terms, significantly lowered our interest rates and put 10k in the bank by purchasing 2 brand new cars. The dealership paid 32k for my wife's 2019 traverse and sold her the exact same 2021 model for 30k we just had to wait a week for it to come in to the dealer. Made no sense

He gave us 1 really good year and a decent end to the season previous

Josh Norman should be numbers 1a 1b and 1c I didn't read the rules assumed it was players that were good for 1 year Didn't read all the way again, I stand by my comment

I vote for a draft starting at 830 or later. Want to make sure my little one is already down for bed.

Why do the tires wear faster? That's interesting. My friend bought a tesla in 2022ish and sold it 3 months later for 11k profit. If we stopped murdering people producing hydrogen engines that's probably the way to go.

So the way it will work is buyers will sign off on being responsible for the payment of the commission. If it can be negotiated as part of the purchase that would be the goal. Again if a home has been sitting on market seller would be dumb not to agree. What no one anywhere can answer for me is how as agents we can know for sure that the buyer has the ability to pay the fee after whatever closing costs and down payment they are responsible for as we don't get all of their financial info like lenders do. Is the option to sue if they can't hold up their end of the buyers agreement that they sign? Firms I've talked to have basically said well we don't want to worry about the possibility of that. If you sue a client for commission I'm assuming you wouldn't be getting any repeat business. If you're buying and selling maybe the agent says hey I'll rep you on the buy side with no guarantee of payment if you list with me. Again the people that this effects the most is going to be first time home buyers.

Can you dm me your venmo account can't find it in the espn emails

I'll get paid tonight. I think he sent an email in the group with the last 4 of his number

They're still going to get paid out of the pot that goes to the seller in terms of concessions 80% of the time. If your home is tip top and priced right you may have a buyer willing to pay their agent but if it's on the market longer than a day that concession to the buyer is going to be part of most offers from buyers.

I think he meant most talented rb

That Hurst signing was atrocious, like just about everything else that happened on shitterers watch

He seems to be getting more out of players then latanzio did for sure. The back line has been light years better this year.

The worst part about the three potential trades for our best players was the 2 we traded in cmc and Moore was those guys were already under large contracts. So not only did we trade them below their value but we also ended up with dead cap space from the deals. We could have traded burns for 0 cap hit for more then we got for our 2 best offensive players and like 30 million in dead cap.

We have the smartest linebacker to ever do it at our disposal and we hire the right hand man to literally the worst gm I've ever seen. The guy who couldn't even successfully run a restaurant. If Dan turns it around great, but from everything I've seen and heard since he took over he doesn't bring any skill set to the table as a GM. Just says we need Dawgs over and over. Really hope I'm wrong.

I'd do it again

There were about 60k people at fanfest in 2015

He was pretty damn good the season before he got paid. Maybe you're right 15/6/6 the year before he got paid and the first year of his deal.

Not the first or last to get a big bag and fall off a cliff

This is the only correct answer. Bryce needs to play the full season for better or worse. The most awful decision would be putting in Dalton if we are 1-6. So that's probably what we will do.

I wouldn't pay a ham sandwich for him at this point. Maybe he was a bad example though. Large market teams always have that one super shitty contract that prevents them from getting better though, then magically some small market team takes it on in like a 6 team trade and they're back in business.

Yeah but poo like this fuging happens. Small teams bail larger market teams out all the time. It makes no sense. Almost like they're required to do so. Just like the clippers being able to unload westbrick the other day.

Every time I can remember we've been getting butt fuged in summer league so I'll take it!