
Mr. Scot
HUDDLER-
Posts
139,496 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Mr. Scot
-
Do you have any actual evidence that the front office has such a low opinion of Darnold (other than that it's your opinion which doesn't mean anything)? Again, public statements made during draft season don't necessarily mean squat. And Verge, who actually does have some level of inside insight, doesn't believe we'll take a quarterback at 8.
-
And here's why you're getting it completely wrong... I'm not convinced. I have no idea whether Darnold is going to be good, great or awful. And despite your strong statements, neither do you. As far as the draft, the same is true about Justin Fields, Mac Jones, Trey Lance or any other quarterback prospect you want to throw in there. None of us knows. What I do believe is that since we traded for Darnold, we need to do the best possible job of supporting him and building a team around him. Otherwise, we're no better than the Jets. You're talking players. I'm talking process. That's the part you fail to understand.
-
In Steelers land, Art Rooney is the final boss
Mr. Scot replied to LinvilleGorge's topic in Carolina Panthers
You can't always be brutally honest if you're an NFL head coach or GM. -
That's the thing. Do we actually know for sure whether or not we have a franchise quarterback? With all due respect to our resident armchair GMs, we don't know that. Even if you take a guy in the draft, you do so because you believe he could be one, but even then you don't know. A lot of people in favor of drafting another QB high say so based on their belief that they already know Darnold isn't going to be good. I don't buy for a minute that the team believes that or would have traded for him if that were true.
-
The idea of a mock draft is it's supposed to be predicated on what teams think about certain players, not what the guy doing the mock thinks. That, to me, is where Simms fails.
-
No argument. I wouldn't want Jones either, but truthfully I'm not so much looking at particular players as I am particular positions. I think drafting a quarterback high in our situation is dumb, but that doesn't mean I'd be on board with drafting a linebacker or a runningback (i.e. the Marty Method).
-
If I thought they made a decision on a position as important as quarterback because "well, we've gotta do something", I'd completely lose faith in their decision making. And Lord knows teams never say things they don't really mean during draft season. I'll grant that the smokescreen thing is overrated, but it definitely isn't non-existent.
-
Unfortunately, he has a point