Mr. Scot
-
Posts
141,632 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Mr. Scot
-
I said one mistake by the braintrust as a whole. You still haven't picked up on what that mistake is.
-
The only point stat that matters is who has more at game's end. Canales, Evero and company were successfully able to pull off wins against several good teams this season. It's pretty sad to have to watch us beat teams that have a good chance at being in the Super Bowl this year only to turn around and lose to a team that was eliminated from playoff contention around week four
-
I think this game was winnable (hell, we almost did).
-
Play action and toss it to the flat and we probably win. Hell, do what the Voles did with McCarthy a little while ago and I'd still say better odds.
-
Second one to point that out And yeah, the playcall on that 4th down was just awful.
-
Hadn't even thought about that. I mean, it was a better coaches game theman the last contest against the Saints, but that and three bucks will get you a gallon of gas. (except in California)
-
The "please get Evero off this fuging team" thread
Mr. Scot replied to Sean Payton's Vicodin's topic in Carolina Panthers
There's an extremely simple path to getting Evero off this team. Just wait till the end of the season when his contract expires. Seriously doubt the Panthers are gonna talk about extending him, and he might not want to stay even if they did. This problem solves itself. -
Who's arguing in favor of the "turd QB"?
-
I assume you know I'm not one of his "defenders". I disagree with the hyperbolic takes because arguments of that sort weaken the overall point. Examples: "Rex Grossman wasn't an elite quarterback." Valid. "Rex Grossman was the worst quarterback in history and any games the Bears won during that era, they won in spite of him. Yeah, no.
-
As an example of an irrelevant point.
-
I'm okay with the discussion, but it's not especially relevant to the current big picture. Said it earlier: Bryce doesn't have to be historically bad to justify us moving on. Hell, he doesn't absolutely even have to be bad at all. He only has to be not good enough.
-
You'll be waiting a while since I didn't bother reading your entire post Granted, that's almost as bad as trying to discuss a game that, by your own admission, you didn't watch, but I'm not necessarily gonna give my best effort against someone I know is sh-tposting.
-
Rick Mirer started a pretty good number. (again, this is all sidebar)
-
You know I'm not worried about the metrics. Mentioned previously that i don't see him back next season, so that problem resolves itself. My one worry is that I'm not sure why Canales didn't fire him this past offseason. That was an easy trigger to justify pulling. Why didn't he?
-
And here i thought you were done for the night
-
Where? On the post game highlights?
-
Johnny Manziel isn't exactly ancient history either. All irrelevant though... I don't give a rip where Bryce ranks historically. All that matters to me is that he isn't good enough to be our franchise guy right now.
-
Did Phil Snow have the second best defense in the league?
-
You could make "times and context" where Cam Newton was a terrible quarterback if you wanted. (focusing on Super Bowl performance as a metric, for example) Your takes are terrible, dude. My only question is whether that's deliberate this time or not.
-
Sure it is... And I'm equally certain it's hot nothing to do with trying to distract that you're bading dogmatic takes on a game you didn't even watch
-
Jamarcus Russell isn't that far back in history.
-
Improved I'd go with, though "leaps and bounds" feels like a stretch, especially after today.
-
Eeehh, I don't know that is go that far.
-
So, you've never said he was the worst in NFL history or anything like that... Right?
-
Who's arguing we should keep him?
