Mr. Scot

I'd say 90% is an awfully high number. It's the smart teams that tend to make the right call. We haven't traditionally been one of the smart teams. I suppose the question would be what percentage of the NFL is smart vs not.

Obviously he'd fit the system, but even the article admits this is all pure speculation. I can't see it.

You know why that's not going to happen

The Panthers have a long tradition of taking the wrong guy, starting all the way back with preferring Kerry Collins over Steve McNair. You had Tshimanga Biakabutuka over Eddie George, DeShaun Foster over Clinton Portis, Jason Peter over Vonnie Holliday, Rae Carruth over... anybody. But you bring up a valid point. Perhaps it's not so much the picks were making as it is the team itself. Maybe at least some of these guys might have turned out better had they gone elsewhere.

Jason Peter wins that competition in a landslide.

You ever been reported to yourself?

Remember the story that the Panthers were considered the least "merit-based" team in the league when it came to playing time? Likewise the saying that we had guys starting on our roster who wouldn't even make a team elsewhere? That's why something like this gets said.

To be fair, even in GM centric operations, head coaches still control the depth chart. I do but in to the idea that Fitterer had increased influence over the offseason personnel process this year. Have a hard time imagining him making playing time decisions though.

Perhaps you should post an excerpt of your own to show what you feel is the point, Chuck.

I have a feeling that Brady deal is gonna turn out to be a disaster of epic proportions.

Kevin Greene had the same issue. Super charismatic guy in life. On TV though, just never looked comfortable.

Didn't we just extend him?

Thomas has shown that he can stop himself from getting to the first down marker.

Guess the next natural question is how good will Payton be in his gig. With him though, I think everybody pretty much expects it to be temporary.

Last year there would have been an obvious option in Brian Daboll. And of course I was a big fan of Nathaniel Hackett. This year, I guess we'll have to see what names emerge.

Don't worry. Nah

Early in the season, it was way more than a small group of fans. A lot of analysts were taking us seriously too. And while some caught on once the course corrected, others didn't.

Brees' football knowledge is top notch. I don't think anyone doubts that. But to be a TV guy you need charisma too. He was kinda lacking on that front.

Well, I was also hoping to trigger you, so I guess I've reached all my goals

I'd love for us to have a true fullback, but that's pretty rare these days.

They were hyped early, and even at the end people were talking about them being "the #2 defense in the league". What I saw though was overall a subpar unit, especially against the run.

I think it's probably more that he just wasn't very good at the job. Brady might not be either.

That'd be you. Any other questions?

No, but their defensive approach was predicated on those characteristics, and we look for the same thing in the corners we draft and sign. Snow's approach is different, but I've been of the opinion that our defense under Snow isn't as good as they've been hyped to be. Could we be affected in a similar manner?

So I guess that didn't go so well...