Jump to content

kungfoodude

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    29,373
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About kungfoodude

  • Birthday 07/15/1981

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

kungfoodude's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Conversation Starter
  • Dedicated Rare
  • First Post
  • Collaborator Rare
  • Posting Machine Rare

Recent Badges

34.7k

Reputation

  1. Yeah, it's not necessarily about who is the best player for the moment, it's about the direction we are headed as a franchise. Seems to be that Morgan has doubled down on a youth movement, so why not see it through?
  2. Yeah, he is leaps and bounds better than Wallace. But the question then becomes, when do you get Wallace the reps to even attempt to develop? I feel the same way about Pratt as I did Ramsey, it's a short solution for a long term situation.
  3. I don't think it is so much how he played as that they are cash strapped with the current roster. See, Hendrickson, Trey.
  4. Well, he would immediately be the best LB on the roster. Buuuut....he really doesn't fit the profile of what we seem to be doing. We are avoiding these older players and seem to be very attached to a youth movement.
  5. I mean, if you literally walk down the starters for that team versus ours, it's fuging embarrassing. Then when you get to the backups, it's WAY more obvious. There is a reason we were largely regarded as the worst roster. It was very earned.
  6. I would LOVE to have the talent that Oakland and NY(Giants) have. They were/are WAAAAAY better rosters. I think we will finally crawl out of that "worst" spot this season, even as a massive sceptic. We need it.
  7. Agreed. Our coaches were better than some of the other dumpster fire teams and we played in the NFC South. That helped. Outside that, a simple look at the roster will very quickly reveal it to be the worst in Panthers franchise history. That was obvious before we had even played a game. It was funny that people were surprised we had a historically bad defense. It was so insanely obvious.
  8. I really don't think it's that debatable. New England had some argument but our roster was far worse, IMO.
  9. We weren't bottom five, we were the bottom.
  10. We SHOULD be better overall than last year. I would say this is still, on paper, firmly a bottom 5 roster in the NFL. I definitely hope that improves over the course of the season.
  11. It's very few proven commodities and heavy on "what if." I am not suggesting it isn't POSSIBLE we are a halfway decent roster but I also don't think it's very likely. Underwhelming is fine and understandable. I just don't want to see dumpster fire again.
  12. I mean, we are gonna stink at some positions. We have a bad roster, so you just have to expect that on a cellar dwelling team. The hope is that it's a net improvement over last season. If we accomplish that, I am good. I don't want to see Rhule era panic and more outgoing draft capital in another foolish "a couple of pieces away" campaign.
  13. Worse than Gabriel is insane. That's "about to be out of the league" status. That draft really will go down as the worst class in NFL history for QB's. If it wasn't for Purdy, there wouldn't be a single NFL QB in the entire thing. But, the most impressive of all is us picking the only one of them that ended up never seeing an NFL game. #TepperMagic
  14. But also a wild d-bag, potential locker room cancer and a media circus. This might actually put the nail in Tomlin's coffin.
×
×
  • Create New...