kungfoodude

Given that we are likely to be only in a marginally better spot than last year, yes. There excuses will be there. Regardless, if he struggles again then the league is going to start looking at him like previous bust QB's. He will get a shot as a backup and journeyman elsewhere and if that doesn't pan out, the options will get far shorter(pun not intended). Although he is likely in a bad spot in 2024, he has to show something or the pool of "It's the Panthers that are dragging him down" folks will start saying, "Why hasn't he improved? Is he fixable?"

Yep. We apparently are anti-BPA. Plus all the trading up and down to get guys that seem like reaches.......boy that all seems really familiar.....

That's the same argument I heard for the last two staffs and the guys we drafted back then. Unfortunately, until that actually happens, I am going to be very skeptical.

This draft feels like the RAS addiction is still lurking in the FO. Just a lot of head scratching moves with better options available. Oh well, such is the way of the Tepper Panthers. It is what it is.

Good Christ that would be a HR. That is at least 3 potential starters.

Absolutely not. 39 is too high for Wilson and I have no desire fo draft Shipley above the 4th.

Drastically? Absolutely not. Still a C tier or lower overall squad, IMO. Improved? Definitely. Adding Johnson gives us another actual NFL WR.

Speaking of boom or bust.....Jesus.

He has the highest ceiling but probably also the lowest floor of the top three guys. True boom or bust guy. But it's better than the low ceiling and even lower floor guy they previously drafted. I kind of think McCarthy ends up a little that way. Great measurables but just never really produced the way he should have, IMO.

I would say that Johnson and Theilen are the only non-replacement level players in our WR corps. So we at least have two guys that have a prayer of getting open in a given game. The rest of that group?? Woof.

I sort of disagree because had he gone to KC or Seattle he would have been surrounded by organizations that are very good at developing players. Here, that is definitely not the case.

That's sort of been the story of us recently. Shooting for the moon and falling into the ocean instead. The trade up was just stupid. But, we will see if the player is worthwhile.

Yeah, those are always case by case. Without really being privvy to the bulk of the details, it's hard to make a judgement. We get little bits, the scouts and FO's get a fair amount more If they deem the risk worthwhile, so be it.

Eh....that can happen but also bring in a professional situation can help. College football is a pretty bad about developing players in terms of football or maturing them as adults.

I think his peak is an elite game manager. He just isn't ever going to be a guy that blows the doors off. We will see. Hope I am incorrect.

I think the truth is that most young QB's struggle in tough situations like Bryce was in. Only the truly elite don't. Which, I think we can all probably agree Bryce is not going to ever be a super elite guy.

Super smart and super pretty. Basically the perfect sports TV personality

And third and fourth and....

The first two rounds are typically starter level players. After that it's mainly rotational or depth guys. Which, we need a ton of depth, as well.

Svech

Historically, spending wildly in free agency has a very rough track record.

This is also how Dan Snyder started out, BTW.

I actually did want him. I said he was the best in that draft.

Need this one. HATE Boston and their fuging fans.