kungfoodude

I was gonna say maybe post-injury.

Baker is much more fixable than Darnold. Although that isn't really saying a lot.

And how many Pitt games did you watch this season?

Replace Pickett with Bridgewater and read the article.

B. We are unable to trade down from 6 but trade 2023 draft picks to move into the 1st, 2nd or 3rd round to get some guy Rhule really wants and will have the Huddle scratching their heads.

Lol. Wut?

So, he was the guy that tried to talk someone else out of Wilson. That's great

I know they haven't been terribly impressive recently. Not sure if that is the department or the leadership, though. That feels like an assessment that would have to be made by someone in the scouting community.

Someone is snitching on themselves. The man publicly states he doesn't know why he is losing and Tepper still has him employed. Pretty sure we all know who the biggest clown in the organization is.

I mean, I did but that would ruin the joke.

I didn't even look at them.

Two of these three is smart. 66.7% chance we don't fug this up.

I'm down. Let's get a LT.

I'm in a weird spot here because I actually agree with him.

He is just used to being a Panthers fan so he is accustomed to fuging up.

I mean, did he embarrass himself or become an instant legend?

Yeah, I think the odds of them taking a QB are slim. They don't need an OT and they may not want to take the remaining DE's at 2.

Just in time for @Zod to get a chance to gaze at the new Panthers wieners. @TheSpecialJuan will be expecting that report.

Okay. I guess you just didn't read them. Either way.

This should apply to the regular season, as well.

Yeah, I mean you can feel free to pick and choose what you decide to read from what I posted. Free country. I would suggest actually opening the articles you post before you post them in the future, however.

I am a consistent PFF defender but they aren't doing science more "sciencey." Remember their metrics are based on human judges. The way they determine "catchable" and "uncatchable" is also likely to be imperfect. It's a good stat but you sort of tried to put out articles that backed up this stat as a predictor of success that were just bad articles(mostly due to time since they had been posted and being proved wrong). The stats themselves I have not a lot of issue with. I generally agree that accuracy is one of the more solid predictors of NFL success. But it doesn't really require digging that far into it, simple completion percentage is an accurate enough predictor. I think they are likely a decent trend with a fairly wide margin for error. Interesting to see, regardless.

Pretty sure he has been Randy for the past few years.

Better arm but similar ceiling.