Jump to content

kungfoodude

HUDDLER
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    29,430

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by kungfoodude

  1. kungfoodude
    KK seems like an obvious option to move but he really has to start humming so we can sell high like we did with Necas. I love Necas but I don't think you will see him blossom into a consistent 100 point scorer like Rantanen is.
  2. kungfoodude
    Yeah, Rantanen is arguably a superstar level player, which we don't have.
  3. kungfoodude
    If KC wins this year and Mahomes gets to 6 at some point, I think it will be hard to say Mahomes might not be better. Lots of career left, so we will see.
  4. kungfoodude
    Yeah, I don't think you are listening to me but I can't really help that.
  5. kungfoodude
    You are saying what I am saying, BTW. Those were all Raider sources and nothing close to Johnson. That was always my argument about that fake narrative.
  6. kungfoodude
    It wouldn't matter if it was, TBH. It rings hollow unless Philly wins a SB.
  7. kungfoodude
    I never read anything saying he was "impressed." IMO, you basically read all the "Raiders sources" and took them at face value.
  8. kungfoodude
    Barkley isn't a Philly draft pick.
  9. kungfoodude
    Trust me, there isn't the ability to be self aware because the combined New England fanbase is cumulatively about 200 IQ points.
  10. kungfoodude
    I mean, potential bust versus literally zero QB? Lol
  11. kungfoodude
    But that is what I always said. Brady isn't remotely a draw.
  12. kungfoodude
    Ask them in a week.
  13. kungfoodude
    It isn't debatable. The Bears have a substantially better roster, they have a potentially franchise QB on a rookie deal and a not idiot owner. Those are all advantages over Vegas. Literally the only "media" advantage was Brady as part owner but being a great player may have nothing to do with that. See Jordan, Michael.
  14. kungfoodude
    We will just have to disagree. There is an older statistical analysis into this but it basically places RB as lowest wins shares/position. That isn't accidental. Now, I will say that has the caveat of that could change over time. It just isn't the case now
  15. kungfoodude
    But it is the best situation.
  16. kungfoodude
    The Raiders always seemed like a insane long shot. I mean....what was the draw?
  17. kungfoodude
    But value IS the core of the argument. RB's represent some of the worst wins/position in the draft. I am not saying that it is insane to take a RB high in the draft but your needs basically need to align with that. Ultimately, in the first two rounds, it is a luxury pick. You basically already have a great roster.
  18. kungfoodude
    I don't think so but I could put together a model looking into that. We would have to agree on the parameters.
  19. kungfoodude
    But to the level they have been paid?
  20. kungfoodude
    I mean....you cannot deny that man the talent he displays. It is exceptional. If it lasts is the crux(Wentz, Stroud, etc).
  21. kungfoodude
    You were saying?
  22. kungfoodude
    It was the best job of this cycle. Stacked roster, not a complete idiot of an owner and has a potential QB ON A ROOKIE DEAL. This was such a no-brainer. Plus the Bears GM isn't an idiot like most of the openings.
  23. kungfoodude
    But did they significantly outpace the guys in the 3rd round or later? The only one in recent memory to do that is Henry. Furthermore, not a single one of those guys has sniffed a championship. That's really more the point. The track record of top RB's or top PAID RB's getting to championships is quite bad. There is a reason for that.
  24. kungfoodude
    @Mr. Scot I told you. This was the only job that really made sense.
  25. kungfoodude
    True. The infuriating thing is he is such a talented player that you want to find a way to use him effectively.
×
×
  • Create New...