CRA

year prior, he was I think the worst WR in all the NFL by several metrics. Just so pointless to have such a low ceiling WR on the field w/ Bryce. We need miracle potential.

he has the lowest ceiling of any skill position player you could put on the field. but as I said, I'm okay w/ it being XL. But odds say it wouldn't be XL. It would be Tremayne or Horn.

that's what people say. So who you gonna deactivate...for him to be this great special teams player (that hasn't seen action in months) and then give him there WR snaps as a perk. I'm only cool if it is XL. And it's won't be.

I would say this season, Bryce is being best managed to not lose us games. Which is sort of how the Teb0w time presents itself late in the games. We have sort of talked about it all year that Canales calls the games how he has to call the games. So, that's why you ultimately see......less 10+ throws than ever before. And his strategy is to pair that with some extremely favoring scenarios to actually throw it downfield (often when a D is playing short yardage vs Bryce that has resulted into the 20+ ones)

Moore is horrible. Renfrow remains a better player today (not high praise lol). But that said, Tremayne is the dude that should see the field. Horn as well. Moore doesn't need to be active (but I feel he will be). Otherwise, what's really the point of this move.

the board doesn't really contain a heavy % of folks that are very critical of Canales AND Bryce to the same degree. you got a lot folks (often those very critical of Byrce)that think Canales is largely making lemonade out of lemons the best he can. I mean, Canales is a very green HC and playcaller so he is going to get some basic criticism all young folks get as they learn.

we 10000% are overachieving this season. No doubt about that. Something to keep in mind if that first place schedule actually holds up to be a tougher one. Ball has bounced our way despite every game day thread being the NFL IS RIGGED AGAINST US rhetoric. You can take a 6ish win team and have the ball go your way and get 8 or against you and finish with 4. It's all a range the same caliber team can find itself in.

Think we lose by an average of 13.7 points when we do on the year.

If I worked for them I would have used the same picture and when I saw you….

No idea. Eric Shelton. That’s not right as he looks like a lineman lol

dang, yall are too good.

Medium difficultly

My preference also is just picking a RB and letting them be the dude. I don’t really care who. Both Hubbard and Rico IMO are volume runners and lesser versions in a split. Both IMO get stronger with reps and flow.

Think it’s 2 things 1 -we hit a stretch of bad defenses when it popped off and it was mid season 2 - teams then really zeroed in on not letting that be a thing and often it was some better defenses going about that mission But if good NFL defenses want to zero in and stop the run….it gets bottled. Tough to run your way out of that issue. Pass has to make them pay big for that.

I literally almost did D with this one. I opted not to here because I think that deserves its own. Evero is the most controversial guy not named Bryce on the huddle and it would dominate most likely.

It’s been answered. Regular season is over. It’s looking at where Dave (a rare O HC here) stands at the conclusion of his second year. And you are whining.

Evero’s defense is best defined by that Baker INT. It’s literally just wanting a QB to be dumb as they get tired of slowly picking it.

You are in here whining about people talking about Dave’s year 2 O in review.

I simply posted the year end final stats. At the years end. Playoffs are always viewed as a next chapter. Which is why the stats are also separated. and it’s relevant to how we now have to go about finding a way to compete…as we all guess the right strategy that should be used on Saturday. And it will be relevant after that. don’t participate in this thread then bro. It’s that easy. Go do Rams only talk or whatever your preference is

As shown here with 2025 vs a 2013 team….slow and plodding is fine. But you need to be like 2013. Not 2025. 2013 we were good when we went about it. Scoring %. TO%. 3rd down % and redzone %.

Canales isn’t being trashed in this thread. There are compliments and critiques. where we stand at the conclusion of year 2 is just elementary and normal football talk…and a we now have finalized season to take it in. it’s also relevant as we look to the postseason. It’s the whole look at yourself in the mirror and think of how are you going to try to find a close game. It’s going to take an ugly game. We got to make it ugly.

I think despite being a suspect playcaller…..he gets a solid grade for his big picture management of how to make the most out of what we have. He has figured out the general managment of how to deploy things to find a close game

Did you stop with a one stat cherry pick because if you went further you saw a 2013 rushing team under a defensive head coach that on offense also was…. 12th - scoring % 7th - TO% 9th - 3rd down % 7th - redzone % And it auto killled your narrative?? It almost seems like you were trying to suggest the 12-4 team was basically similar lol. This what made it drastically different

27th ranked O (yardage) 27th- points 27th - yards per offensive play 27th - scoring % 29th - TO% 25th - 3rd down % 24th - redzone % 26th - EPA/play

the entire Bryce defense system is built on ignoring 99% of stats......find one very very specific angle to look at him and declare that is all that matters. In this case, it also involves only half a season for that one stat to be looked at.