Jump to content

Waldo

All-PRO
  • Posts

    9,731
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Waldo

  1. I would rather have the FS than Golden. Golden looks solid, like him more than Tet from what I have seen. Still not ending up with the best playable immediately talent on the D would be a hard fail in round 1. The D's free agency injection was a start but not close enough to where it needs to be.
  2. My 2 big negatives are not upgrading a one of many positions that needs improvement and not a good look for a franchise that is at the bottom of the leauge in wins recently. Bringing in a rookie to play next to Hunt and offsetting his bloated contract with a rookie contract is what good teams would do. It's set up for next year anyways and his health is an unknown at this point. No idea about the savings this year it would be a cya move moving forward for sure. Also, there could be a hole in the center of the line so it's not like improvement isn't unwelcome long term, even if they really need to find players on the D to inject imediate competition at the minimum. They still need to take one some time this draft and I'm fine with a later development type guy of Moton's wheels have one last year in him.
  3. Best news of the offseason. No one who is available at 8 will be much different than in the twenties this year. Trade back with an additional 2nd is still my wish scenario.
  4. The only part of this that is surprising post Carr is anyone wanting Rogers with the totality of what he showed in NJ. Dude is nothing but a name and a bag of cancer he brings with him. I'm glad Sanders is heating up. It increases the chances of a trade back and that's absolutely what I am still wishing for.
  5. I only think they do that trade for Sanders if we are talking to other teams at 8. If they were woried about us taking their pick they would try and jump to 7. I have no idea what they want to do if Carr is not dead weighting their roster this year but they have to be looking hard now.
  6. Right? From every angle it's a win. Not sure if getting more and sending it elsewhere or watching the Saints take Sanders while having to eat Carr's dead money appeals to me more still. Either way win-win for the Panthers
  7. Just take less value for a trade back this year. 'But the trade value chart'... just doesn't matter when an extra 2nd should be enough to move back this year given the situation. I would take an extra 2nd over any player that could potentially be there at 8 and it's not close. Let the media bitch about it, just doesn’t matter if we walk away with an edge, FS and WR in the first 2 rounds given how close all of that talent is when looking at it big picture. Fug the value chart and just give me a decent additional 2nd for the win. All it takes is someone falling in love with Sanders or the RB or whatever. If there was more talent in this draft then that would be a terrible idea but turning down a trade because the value was less than other years when the tellent is obviously less at the top of this draft would just show how poorly the people in charge understand this class and it's weaknesses. It would be like not finding a slot WR or RB later, just dumb IMO.
  8. Having Sanders go to the Saints is the consolation prize for not being able to trade back. That is a QB we should love playing agaisnt twice a year.
  9. Olsen was drafted with pick 31. Why are we comparing the epitome of a quality TE without burst to the bust of Pitts (terrible hands for a receiving TE) and Howard (just an all around bust)? Olsen was a great 2nd round TE taken 2 picks early. That's what Warren looks like...well he looks slower than Olsen by a bit to me. In no reality is that worth a top 10 pick IMO. It's going to be fun watching the team that drafts him realize his speed and size won't look the same in the NFL. Maybe we can trade for him like we did with Olsen in year 3 or 4 of his rookie deal.
  10. Too early to tell. It's different in that aspect but if the draft is the same old then it's just polishing the turd. Not going on prodays was a basic step towards bare minimum. We will see.
  11. I think the Teppers are terrible at football but they aren't clueless about everything. Tepper made a big effort to distance himself from the draft last year after the debacle of a process of 23'. He clearly learns somethings but then the 24' draft is the same old since he showed up with 'new' faces even with his efforted distance. Look I want improvement to happen. I want the Teppers to become better owners. I just need to see more than basic pr moves that anyone with experience would suggest to belive it's truely meaningful. Even if they are not meddling to the previous levels, and that's an if still, then they need to learn to hire better. I think Tillis has been their only quality hire since purchasing the team. Morgan sticking around after his work from '23 was a terrible sign, even if I loved him as a player. Keeping Evero giving the quality of his work is a terrible sign too. Morgan can make all the faces he wants and sit in his chamber as long as he wants but he isn't impressing me at all as a GM. The last draft was not good and I'm waiting to see if meaningful change shows up there this year. Plenty of people said Young would struggle, just not the useless tslking heads. I also remember the consensus flipping to Young once the leaks started. The leaks are 2 for 2 the last 2 years. We are 2 weeks out and I haven't seen the obvious signs so that may be an improvement too...even if it is also a basic concept in the NFL.
  12. Sanders isn't worth it. He looked like a polished but limited QB. They should have learned after Pickett but finding out they are desperate enough to do something that dumb wouldn't be surprising given their situation. Take that trade. Take a trade with a discounted value too. 21 is fine. Getting 2nds in 26 and 27 vs a 1st in 26 is fine. This is a 5 win team that needs a lot of chances are young talent. The people in the 20s won't be thst much different than at 8 in this draft. I would rather have their 2nd than the rest of the picks this year. Getting a 2nd this year would be ideal given the talent in that range.
  13. The only people that don't like Olsen in that job are the people who hated watching their team play him. Years of ex-players that make mute a better option during games make him a stud in comparison.
  14. Brady is a terrible TV personality and Olsen kills it.
  15. That entire unit deserved a hard reset. Just draft someone in the 2nd or 3rd and they should beat out Scott or another Franklin. Gunner is cool but at 29 it would be nice to let a young guy get reps to see if there could be any further development. I don't mind special teams guys sticking around but they have to be amazing for me to really care.
  16. I would still skip it. Carter should go that way but droping a couple of picks with cameras in my face is something I would avoid personally.
  17. I wouldn't go this year if I wasn't Hunter or Ward. Who knows how the teir 2 guys break in this draft. Go hang out with family or just go fishing or whatever instead.
  18. He was saying so but who knows. I agree. Dude has been nothing but empty hype. The opposite of a McDermott here.
  19. The problem with bringing Evero back is that decision falls on DC or at least that was the public stance. If he fails then DC is responsible. They are building around him big this year and are projected to draft heavey on the D side. DC doesn't have to be hands on that side but willingly brining back a coordinator that went 32/32 while putting up historic numbers would still fall at his feet hard. What quality DC would he get for year 3 while probably being on the hot seat in thst situation? I do not get why Evero is still here from any angle.
  20. I would rather have Ez vs the other pass rushers. Dude is a football player and not a workout warrior. This year they need a football player and not a project. Not sexy but if we can't trade back I would still be fine taking him at #8. IDGAF about other people's boards, just not important to me. Walker has upside and would be the pick if we didn't stink at development and weren't so desperate for impactful play.
  21. It was a classic over reaction. They worked so much elsewhere that going only run support at SS was a spaze move because of how bad run support was last year and how good he is with it. I do not see that one working out and if the front 7 is as improved in run support as it looks then he is useless. Once clowney goes down thr pass rush will dry up is my guess. Not a good combo with him at SS.
  22. Lol they messed up. Moehrig was such a bone head move IMO.
  23. He looks good to me. He doesn't project well to the 4-3 but that isn't what we run. He looks like a football player vs a project. His height is fine, so he isn't 6'6". 22 reps so not week but still needs work there which is very attainable. He will be 22 in September. Lots to like. This would be a solid pick at 8 or better yet a hop back and then take this guy after others take some of the other 'yeah, but' guys.
×
×
  • Create New...